Calculating Waves on a String: Answer Justification and Confusion Dispelled"

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobrsanchez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the number of waves reaching the end of a string when one end is shaken every second. The original calculation suggested that only one wave would arrive every 10 seconds, based on a wave velocity of 0.5 m/s. However, the book states that 10 waves reach the end in 10 seconds, as one wave is launched each second. Clarification reveals that while only one wave reaches the end in the first 10 seconds, subsequent intervals see 10 waves arriving, assuming the string is saturated with waves. This distinction resolves the confusion regarding wave propagation and timing.
bobrsanchez
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I cannot seem to find a way to justify my book's answer to this problem:

One end of a string is shaken each second sending a wave with an amplitude of 10cm toward the other end. The string is 5m long and wavelength of each wave is 50cm. How many waves reach the other end of the string in each 10s interval?

Now my initial answer was calculated by figuring out the wave velocity = 0.5m/second using v=wavelength times frequency. I then divided the length of string by velocity to get 10 seconds for each wave to reach the other end of the string. Therefore my answer was 1 every 10 second interval.

The book however simply states that since frequency is 1 wave per second, then regardless of all other information given, the answer is that 10 waves reach the other end of the string every 10 seconds.

I find that answer very hard to swallow, mainly because for that to happen, that means the wave velocity must be 5m/s in order for each wave to only take one second to reach the other end, and I simply do not see that happening. Could somebody please dispel my confusion? Thanks in advance!

Edit: I think I see what my book is saying now. But in order for that to be the case, the string must be saturated with waves to begin with, right? In other words, wouldn't the very first interval of 10 seconds still only have 1 wave reaching the other end of the string?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Now my initial answer was calculated by figuring out the wave velocity = 0.5m/second using v=wavelength times frequency. I then divided the length of string by velocity to get 10 seconds for each wave to reach the other end of the string. Therefore my answer was 1 every 10 second interval.

You are forgetting that there is more than one wave on the string at anyone time. Your answer assumes that one wave is launched (taking 1 second) then the man waits 9 seconds before launching another.

The book answer is correct. In 10 seconds 10 waves are launched so 10 must arrive at the other end.

Edit: I think I see what my book is saying now. But in order for that to be the case, the string must be saturated with waves to begin with, right? In other words, wouldn't the very first interval of 10 seconds still only have 1 wave reaching the other end of the string?

That's correct.

The question says "How many waves reach the other end of the string in each 10s interval?" So a full answer would be something like "In the first 10 seconds only 1 wave reaches the other end. In the next and all subsequent 10 second intervals 10 waves reach the other end".
 
Okay thank you very much. Thats what I suspected to be the long answer the book neglected to provide. Thanks again for confirming!

Cheers
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top