Calculating Work and Flux Using Green's Theorem: A Square Example

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using Green's Theorem to calculate work and flux for a vector field defined as $\overrightarrow{F}=2xy\hat{\imath}+3x^2y\hat{ \jmath }$ over a square region bounded by the lines $x=0$, $x=1$, $y=0$, and $y=1$. The calculations provided confirm that the work done is $\frac{1}{2}$ and the flux is $2$. Participants agree on the correctness of the calculations and emphasize proper notation, suggesting the use of $\oint_C{\overrightarrow{F}} \cdot d\vec R$ for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's Theorem
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of curl and divergence operations
  • Ability to perform double integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Green's Theorem in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the relationship between curl and flux in vector fields
  • Explore advanced topics in vector calculus, such as Stokes' Theorem
  • Practice solving problems involving vector fields and line integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are looking to deepen their understanding of vector calculus and its applications in calculating work and flux using Green's Theorem.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

"Use the Green's Theorem to calculate the work and the flux for the closed anti-clockwise direction that consists of the square which is determined by the lines $x=0$, $x=1$, $y=0$ and $y=1$ if $\overrightarrow{F}=2xy\hat{\imath}+3x^2y\hat{ \jmath }$."I have done the following:

$$\text{Work }: \oint_C{\overrightarrow{F}}dR=\int \int_R {\nabla \times \overrightarrow{F} \cdot \hat{n}}dA=\iint_R {\nabla \times \overrightarrow{F} \cdot \hat{k}}dA=\iint_R {(6xy-2x)}dA=\int_0^1 \int_0^1(6xy-2x)dxdy=\int_0^1(3y-1)dy=\frac{1}{2}$$

$$\text{Flux }: \oint_C{\overrightarrow{F} \cdot \hat{n}}ds=\iint_R{\nabla \cdot \overrightarrow{F}}dA=\iint_R{(2y+3x^2)}dA=\int_0^1 \int_0^1{(2y+3x^2)}dxdy=\int_0^1{(2y+1)}dy=2$$

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

"Use the Green's Theorem to calculate the work and the flux for the closed anti-clockwise direction that consists of the square which is determined by the lines $x=0$, $x=1$, $y=0$ and $y=1$ if $\overrightarrow{F}=2xy\hat{\imath}+3x^2y\hat{ \jmath }$."I have done the following:

$$\text{Work }: \oint_C{\overrightarrow{F}}dR=\int \int_R {\nabla \times \overrightarrow{F} \cdot \hat{n}}dA=\iint_R {\nabla \times \overrightarrow{F} \cdot \hat{k}}dA=\iint_R {(6xy-2x)}dA=\int_0^1 \int_0^1(6xy-2x)dxdy=\int_0^1(3y-1)dy=\frac{1}{2}$$

$$\text{Flux }: \oint_C{\overrightarrow{F} \cdot \hat{n}}ds=\iint_R{\nabla \cdot \overrightarrow{F}}dA=\iint_R{(2y+3x^2)}dA=\int_0^1 \int_0^1{(2y+3x^2)}dxdy=\int_0^1{(2y+1)}dy=2$$

Is this correct?

Yep. All correct! (Happy)Btw, I would write $$\oint_C{\overrightarrow{F}} \cdot d\vec R$$ or $$\oint_C{\overrightarrow{F}} \cdot \hat c dR$$ to be notationally correct.
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. All correct! (Happy)

Great! (Yes)

I like Serena said:
Btw, I would write $$\oint_C{\overrightarrow{F}} \cdot d\vec R$$ or $$\oint_C{\overrightarrow{F}} \cdot \hat c dR$$ to be notationally correct.

Ok! Thank you! (Smirk)
 
At the calculation of work, we took $\hat{n}=\hat{k}$, because the square is at the plane $xy$, right?
 
mathmari said:
At the calculation of work, we took $\hat{n}=\hat{k}$, because the square is at the plane $xy$, right?

Yes.
 
I like Serena said:
Yes.

Ok!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K