Calculating work done using vectors

AI Thread Summary
The work done by a constant force F on a particle moving from the origin to a position r is calculated using the dot product, yielding W = -7.41 J. The formula W = F·d highlights that only the component of force in the direction of displacement contributes to work, while perpendicular forces do not. This distinction is crucial, as forces acting at angles can result in some force being wasted in non-displacement directions. The discussion emphasizes understanding vector operations over using the Pythagorean theorem for work calculations. Understanding these principles clarifies why only certain components of force and displacement are relevant in work calculations.
ClassicRock
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A single constant force F = (2.84i + 4.60j) N acts on a 4.12 kg particle. Calculate the work done by this force if the particle moves from the origin to the point having the vector position r = (1.52i - 2.55j) m.



Homework Equations


W=FD


The Attempt at a Solution



W=(2.84*1.52)+(4.60*-2.55)
W=-7.41 J

This is the correct answer. I want to know why I can't use the pythagorean identity in order to find Force and Distance. Why can't I do that instead of the what I have shown here (could someone help me out with the name?).

Thanks,
ClassicRock
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation should be ##W=\vec{F}\cdot\vec{d}## ... which is a definition.
Notice that it is a vector dot-product, not a multiplication.
The force perpendicular to the displacement does not contribute to the work.

Consider - if you push a trunk along the floor by pressing at an angle downwards, some of your force goes into the ground doesn't it? Not all you effort moves anything.

But you may find it more intuitive to think another way - the component of the path perpendicular to the force requires no work.

It is fairly easy to walk around the contour of a hill - keeping the same height all the time.
It is only when you move up or down the hill that you have to work at it.
So only the component of your path that goes up or down the hill contributes to the overall work.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top