Calculus limit and sequence Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit of the sequence \(\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} {\frac{n!}{2^n}}=\infty\), which falls under the subject area of calculus, specifically limits and sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the necessity of showing that the sequence exceeds every positive natural number K and discuss the implications of monotonicity in the sequence. There are attempts to clarify the conditions under which the limit approaches infinity and the relevance of comparing the growth rates of the numerator and denominator.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some offering hints and suggestions for proving the limit. There is recognition of the importance of demonstrating that the sequence is monotonically increasing and that the elements exceed K for all n greater than K. Multiple interpretations of the proof requirements are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the type of proof required and the implications of the limits of the numerator and denominator as n approaches infinity. There is a mention of imposed homework rules regarding the nature of the assistance requested.

mr.tea
Messages
101
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


prove: [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} {\frac{n!}{2^n}}=\infty[/tex]

Homework Equations


Def. of a limit

The Attempt at a Solution


I would like to know if my solution is right or not. I think it is right but I would like to get a feedback. Please do not give me the answer, just directions/hints/things to think about, etc.

I need to show that for every (let's assume) positive natural number K (because I am going positively large, so negative numbers are not reasonable), I need to show that the sequence is larger then K from some place.

I thought to use the K I will be given to prove it. So I tried to find when:

[tex]\frac{K!}{2^K}>K[/tex]

and I have: [tex]\leftrightarrow K!>K*2^K \leftrightarrow (K-1)!>2^K[/tex]

And this is true for all K>=6. The proof is by induction(please feel free to correct me if I am wrong).

So, we take the max(K,7) and then it is true.

What do you think? (This is just a draft, so it will be more formal).

Thanks
Thomas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not sufficient to prove that the sequence exceeds every K for some element. Imagine the sequence 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 3, 0, 4, ... - it will do the same, but it does not have infinity as limit.

In addition to what you have shown, you can also show that the sequence is increasing monotonically. Alternatively, show that the elements of the sequence are larger than K not only for element n=K but for all beyond that (K+1, K+2, ...) as well
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mr.tea
Thank you.
I don't know how I forgot about the monotonically of the sequence(proved it but left it out for some reason).

If I knew how to show that the elements of the sequence are larger than K and beyond, I would prefer this solution, because I think it should be easier, but could not find the way to do this. Hints or ways to think about that would be great.

Thank you again!
Thomas
 
Well, once you know that the sequence is increasing monotonically and ##\frac{K!}{2^K}>K##, then ##\frac{n!}{2^n}>K## for n>K is a direct consequence.

f(n)=n-10 as lower bound would work as well, the limit of this sequence is obvious.
 
I don't know what kind of proof they are looking for, but you could just argue by which value is greater, the limit of the numerator as n->inf or the limit of the denominator as n->inf
 
YoshiMoshi said:
I don't know what kind of proof they are looking for, but you could just argue by which value is greater, the limit of the numerator as n->inf or the limit of the denominator as n->inf
No, that's not valid. Both limits are infinite.
$$\lim_{n \to \infty} n! = \infty$$
$$\lim_{n \to \infty} 2^n = \infty$$
 
oh sorry, it's been a while since calc 1, but I thought there was something that since the numerator approaches infinity faster than the denominator that the limit would tend to inf instead of zero?
 
YoshiMoshi said:
oh sorry, it's been a while since calc 1, but I thought there was something that since the numerator approaches infinity faster than the denominator that the limit would tend to inf instead of zero?
Since the OP needs to prove that the limit of the fraction is ∞, the numerator would have to get large more quickly than the denominator, but taking the limits of the numerator and denominator aren't necessarily helpful, and especially so in this case.
 
Thank you all!

In the end I have decided to also show that the sequence is increasing monotonically.

Thank you all again for helping me.

Thomas.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K