Calculus: Understanding Lower/Upper Bounds and Epsilon

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_ArtofScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concepts of lower and upper bounds in calculus, specifically focusing on the symbols epsilon (ε) and delta (δ). Epsilon represents an arbitrary but fixed positive value used in proofs, while delta is a specific value that ensures the relationship holds for a given epsilon and x. The distinction is crucial for understanding continuity and limit points in calculus. The conversation also highlights the importance of these symbols in mathematical definitions and proofs. Overall, grasping the difference between epsilon and delta is essential for mastering calculus concepts.
The_ArtofScience
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I recently opened a calculus textbook to understand the exact definitions of lower upper bound and greater lower bound. The book went into a discussion over "neighborhoods" explaining that if one were asked to prove a limit point, assume that x lies between 0 and a funny looking symbol that looks like some curled S. To prove lower upper bounds and greater lower bounds, the symbol episolon was used.

I'm curious, what is the real difference between episolon and that curled S? (Sorry I couldn't find a latex image for it but it looks like partial charges from chemistry)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You mean \delta? That's a delta, it's Greek the version of a d. The capital version looks like this: \Delta

Assuming that you did mean delta, the difference is that they are typically used in different settings. For instance, the definition of a continuous function is this:

For all \varepsilon > 0 and for all x, \ \exists \delta > 0 such that if \lvert x - y \rvert < \delta then \lvert f(x) - f(y) \rvert < \varepsilon

Epsilon is some arbitrary but fixed value such that the statement is true for all positive values.
Delta is some selected value that makes the statement work for a specific epsilon and for a specific x.

In general, the situation is which you will see them is that epsilon is arbitrary but fixed (and you want your proof to work for all values of epsilon > 0) whereas delta is going to be some particular number (depending on the situation, it might depend on some other numbers such as epsilon or x) that specifies some sort of bounded interval that makes the proof work.
 
Last edited:
Funny

hey, man. May i have a question? May i post a message to you? [/size]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top