- #1
Pengwuino
Gold Member
- 5,124
- 20
http://famulus.msnbc.com/famulusgen/reuters09-15-163305.asp?t=renew&vts=91520061658
I love it. The fine needs a couple extra 0's however. If I have to pick between saving peoples lives and not being able to laugh my ass off when some starbucks drinking, ipod playing 17 year old gets pulled over and fined (or, if possible, tires shot out by our humble police force putting their lives on the line everyday for the public) through the nose, the choice is obvious.
2008 though, what the hell. Educate the public? You need almost 2 years to get the point "What you use to do all the time that killed so many people will now get you ticketed (or arrested in a perfect world)" across? That's just a cop out to allow the ACLU or some lawyer bregade to file suit and eventually get it repealed because some soccer mom can't make her 80 calls a day to their kids.
California needs to eat bart's shorts.
OAKLAND, Sept. 15 — California Friday banned motorists from talking on cell phones unless they use a headset or speakerphone, although the law will not take effect until July 1, 2008, to allow time to educate the public.
I love it. The fine needs a couple extra 0's however. If I have to pick between saving peoples lives and not being able to laugh my ass off when some starbucks drinking, ipod playing 17 year old gets pulled over and fined (or, if possible, tires shot out by our humble police force putting their lives on the line everyday for the public) through the nose, the choice is obvious.
2008 though, what the hell. Educate the public? You need almost 2 years to get the point "What you use to do all the time that killed so many people will now get you ticketed (or arrested in a perfect world)" across? That's just a cop out to allow the ACLU or some lawyer bregade to file suit and eventually get it repealed because some soccer mom can't make her 80 calls a day to their kids.
California needs to eat bart's shorts.
Last edited by a moderator: