Can a Flow Meter with Wide Scale Graduations Have Accurate Repeatability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollingstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flowmeter
AI Thread Summary
A flow meter with wide scale graduations, such as 2 units apart, can still claim a repeatability of 0.5% of full scale, which translates to a precision of 0.5 units for readings between 0 and 100. However, the concern arises regarding how users can ascertain this repeatability when the scale markings are not fine enough to indicate smaller increments. The spacing of the scale lines may hinder the user's ability to determine if the readings are consistently returning to the same point. Without finer graduations, the practical usability of the repeatability metric becomes questionable for the user. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the flow meter's repeatability is limited by the resolution of its scale.
rollingstein
Messages
644
Reaction score
16
Can a flow meter whose scale has graduations only 2 units apart (e.g. 90,92,94,96,98,100) have a legitimate advertised repeatablity of 0.5% of the Full Scale?

The scale runs 0 to 100 so that'd mean readings repeatable within 0.5%. When marks itself are 2 units apart how does this make sense?

In particular, I was referring to this instrument:

http://www.omega.com/Green/pdf/FL1500.pdf
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That means that for a given flow, the bob will always return to within .5% the same spot every time. Not sure how the spacing of the scale lines could possibly effect that.
 
Integral said:
That means that for a given flow, the bob will always return to within .5% the same spot every time. Not sure how the spacing of the scale lines could possibly effect that.

In the sense, if you do not have a fine enough spacing of scale lines how do you know it returned to the same spot or how close to the same spot.

I guess an external mark, but to a user of the instrument isn't any repeatablity less than the minimum scale graduation a lost metric. How can he use it?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top