Can a generator safely handle full load amps at different power factors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Josh111
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the capability of a synchronous, brushless generator to handle full load amps under different power factor conditions, specifically comparing resistive loads with a power factor of 1.00 to loads with a power factor of 0.8. The focus includes theoretical implications, practical limitations, and the relationship between KVA and KW ratings.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the current and power ratings for both power factors, suggesting that the generator can handle full load amps at a power factor of 1.00 despite exceeding the KW rating.
  • Another participant questions the type of rotor in the generator and emphasizes the distinction between maximum current in the stator windings and maximum power output related to mechanical torque.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of distinguishing between KVA and KW ratings, particularly at a power factor of 1.00, where the KW rating appears to be overloaded.
  • Another participant notes that KVA limits current in the stator winding while KW limits mechanical torque and stresses in the alternator.
  • One participant mentions the common practice of measuring apparent power in volt-amps and real power in watts, indicating the complexity of measuring power factor in practical scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the generator can safely handle full load amps at a power factor of 1.00 without overheating, and there is no consensus on the implications of exceeding the KW rating.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the definitions of KVA and KW ratings, the impact of power factor on generator performance, and the potential mechanical limitations of the generator. There are unresolved questions about the generator's design and operational limits under varying load conditions.

Josh111
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
We have a synchronous, brushless (not permenant magnet) generator with the following ratings:

3 phase brushless alternator
Model TFW-24
Volt 120/208
Frequency 60 Hz.
Phase 3
KW (P) 24
KVA 30
Power Factor (Cos) 0.8
Insulation class B
Protection Type IP21
Rat S1
Standard JB/T3320-1 2000

If a load with a power factor of 0.8 is applied and the nameplate full load current is drawn, The killowatt is 24 and the killovoltamp is 30. (corresponding exactly to nameplate ratings)
(Since KW = I * E *1.73 * PF and KVA = I * E * 1.73)
or in this case: 24Kw = 83 * 208 * 1.73 * 0.8 and
30KVA = 83 * 208 * 1.73


However if a resistive load with a power factor of 1.00 is applied and the nameplate full load current is drawn, The killowatt is 30 and the killovoltamps is also 30. (Killowatt rating is 125% of nameplate rating while current is at nameplate rating.)
Since KW = I * E *1.73 * PF and KVA = I * E * 1.73
or in this case: 30Kw = 83 * 208 * 1.73 * 1.00 and
30Kva = 83 * 208 * 1.73

Can the generator handle nameplate full load amps without overheating in both situations described above regardless of the fact that the nameplate killowatt rating is overreached when a resistive load is applied?

From what I understand a generator's power factor rating is how low the power factor the load can go at full load amps, and although it is uncommon that it is needed, load power factors can be lower but the load amperage will need to be lowered to prevent overheating of the generator stator. This leads me to believe that if the power factor of a load is 1.00 it can run at full load amperage, which as shown in the above calculations is 125% of rated killowatt. Please let me know if this is wrong.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First, Does this synchronous generator have a permanent magnet rotor, or does the armature have windings and slip rings?
The generator has two ratings. One is the maximum current in the stator windings, which relates to the volt-amp rating. The second is related to the maximum power output, which is related to the maximum mechanical torque that can be applied to the input shaft at synchronous RPM (torque x 2 pi x rpm/60 = watts). I would stick to the 24 KW and the 30 KVA nameplate ratings.
 
Bob S said:
First, Does this synchronous generator have a permanent magnet rotor, or does the armature have windings and slip rings?
The generator has two ratings. One is the maximum current in the stator windings, which relates to the volt-amp rating. The second is related to the maximum power output, which is related to the maximum mechanical torque that can be applied to the input shaft at synchronous RPM (torque x 2 pi x rpm/60 = watts). I would stick to the 24 KW and the 30 KVA nameplate ratings.

The generator is a brushless type (not permanent magnet rotor.)

My question is that at a power factor of 1 should the KVA or KW rating be used? At full load amps the KW is overloaded with a power cfactor of 1 as described earlier.
 
In practice, volt-amps is used to measure apparent power, and watts is used to measure real power.

This is because when you buy power, you are buying real power. It is common practice to measure just voltage and current (RMS values) when simple benchmarking or testing an electrical machine as being able to measure power factor or phase difference requires more complex equipment.
 
KVA is basically a limit on the current in the stator winding. The KW rating is a limit on the input mechanical torque, and associated mechanical stresses, in the alternator.
I am not familiar with the Tawasi brand. See
http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/248152419/BRUSHLESS_SYNCHRONOUS_ALTERNATOR.html
As long as the unit is under warranty, I would not exceed nameplate specifications, for either KVA or KW..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K