Can a Klein Bottle Manifold Describe Certain Mechanical Systems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JorisL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Klein Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Klein Bottle manifolds in describing mechanical systems. Participants explore the potential for a mechanical system, like a pendulum with a sliding support point, to represent a Klein Bottle as its configuration space. The conversation also touches on the relevance of Klein Bottles in general relativity, noting their compact and non-orientable nature, which complicates their use in observational contexts. Although the Klein Bottle is a hypothetical object, its properties are considered in relation to mechanical systems and theoretical physics. The dialogue concludes with a realization of a specific system that aligns with the Klein Bottle's characteristics.
JorisL
Messages
489
Reaction score
189
Hi

Yesterday during a lecture the Klein Bottle manifold was mentioned.
We've been busy with describing the natural way of conducting mechanics on manifolds for a while now.

Does anybody know how an example of a mechanical system which is described by a klein bottle manifold? I've been trying to think of one and googling didn't really result in anything. Just mentions of the klein bottle but no examples.
I have read something about a sliding constraint + another one but I can't find it anymore (my bad).

Are this kind of manifolds used in GR as well?

Kind regards,

Joris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JorisL said:
Are this kind of manifolds used in GR as well?

Space-time manifolds are not chosen a priori in general relativity at the level of the Einstein field equation nor does solving the Einstein field equation fully specify the space-time manifold. However if one is more interested in global properties of general Lorentzian manifolds (such as causal structure), and not in local geometries solving the Einstein field equation, then sure: any smooth 4-manifold with a Lorentzian metric is a valid candidate. For observational/experimental purposes however a Klein bottle would probably not be considered because it is compact and there is a theorem in GR that any compact Lorentzian manifold contains closed time-like curves, not to mention it is non-orientable so a volume 4-form can't be defined on the space-time.
 
SteamKing said:
Unlike the Mobius strip, which can be constructed using a strip of paper, Klein bottles and tesseracts (a four dimensional cube) are only hypothetical objects, since we have no way of accessing a fourth spatial dimension. The three dimensional models you see of Klein bottles are not the 'real' thing since they self-intersect, which the true object would not do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein_bottle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesseract

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Möbius_strip

Well, of this I knew. However the lecturer implied that one can think of systems that have a Klein Bottle as their configuration space. I however can't seem to think of one. It's also true that we haven't seen any way to identify the structure of a manifold with a manifold in mechanical systems.

@WannabeNewton
Thanks for this complete and comprehensive answer. I believe I get what you're trying to say. Or will get it when I've put a little more thought into it.
 
*Kick*

I think I've found a system which does this.
A pendulum with a sliding support point, if you get what I mean.
The distance over which to slide is finite (up and down the bar).
I can relate it to the image of the square on this wiki lemma in the part about the construction.

Thanks for the explanations

Edit:
I actually came up with this during a simplified lecture/overview devoted to the nobel prize and the Higgs topic. This kind of system was used as an analog for something. Glad I went because I almost forgot about it.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top