Can a Laser Beam be Repeated Across Multiple Points?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of projecting a laser beam across multiple points within the 600nm-900nm range. The original poster, Mina, seeks clarification on whether a device could take a single laser input and replicate it at various output points. Responses indicate that splitting a laser beam into multiple beams is complex, and each output point would typically require its own laser source. Additionally, there is a reminder about the importance of laser safety in any experimental context. Overall, the conversation highlights the technical challenges and safety considerations involved in such a project.
rnbguy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I'm new here and forgive me if I've posted in the wrong section, I'm more of a computer engineering/architect guy asking a physics question.

Is it possible to have a projected laser beam repeated across multiple points? between the range of 600nm-900nm ?

Example, a pad that takes in the laser beam and repeats the same output across multiple points of the pad.

Thank you,
Mina
 
Science news on Phys.org
rnbguy said:
Is it possible to have a projected laser beam repeated across multiple points? between the range of 600nm-900nm ?

Example, a pad that takes in the laser beam and repeats the same output across multiple points of the pad.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. Are you asking if you can split a laser beam into multiple beams?
 
:welcome:

rnbguy said:
a pad that takes in the laser beam and repeats the same output across multiple points of the pad.

I'm not sure I understand your question. But in your example, every one of those multiple points would have to have its own laser.

If you are experimenting, laser safety is very important. Is your question theoretical or are you experimenting?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top