Can a Relativistic Impact Drill a Hole Through Earth?

AI Thread Summary
A hypothetical object with a radius of 100 m and a speed of 299,792,455 m/s could potentially drill a hole through Earth due to its immense kinetic energy, estimated at 1.17x10^10 kg. The impact's outcome would vary significantly based on whether the object is rigid or liquid-like, affecting how it interacts with Earth's material. The energy transfer during impact raises questions about the motion of material in the object's path, with concerns about creating degenerate or neutron matter. The discussion suggests that the object's composition may be less critical than the energy dynamics involved. Overall, the scenario presents intriguing implications for hypervelocity impacts on Earth.
John Clement Husain
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
If I were to have an object that is floating in space, with a radius of 100 m , that is going to crash unto Earth from a distance of 94,725,000 m and a speed of 299,792,455 m/s, how will it affect earth?(in terms of recoil or rebound.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm, let me put that as 1.17x1010 kg
 
Is has enough energy to drill a hole through Earth. It has enough energy to move the whole column of material at 70000km/s in the end (unless I made a mistake, which is likely).
I'm no expert at hypervelocity impacts but I don't think there is enough time for a sideways motion of the material in the path of the Thing. But I also don't see how the energy would get transferred to that column of material. Probably it would create a layer of degenerate or even neutron matter on impact, that would get thicker as the Thing moves through the Earth.
Also I don't think it really matters what the Thing is made of.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top