nismaratwork
- 358
- 0
DanP said:Ah eugenics :P Hitler was a big fan.
Everyone is a fan in theory, it's the practice that makes monsters.
DanP said:Ah eugenics :P Hitler was a big fan.
Grimstone said:we are not defining alive with "what if's".
Grimstone said:I do not agree. We do not define knowledge with "what it" we define it with facts, proven and re-creatable data that is as close to irrefutable as possible.
the "what ifs" are what causes science to look for the facts to prove or disprove it.
The truth is. we need the What ifs, they help the sturdy minded, non free thinking, humans to look outside the box.
nismaratwork said:Then by all means, tell me how you prove an artificial construct for humans to demarcate something that only matters to us?
The truth may be, but we deal with theories, all of which are wrong... and that's not my original thinking there. In a science as far from physics as biology, you begin to tread the waters between science and art.
Grimstone said:I may misunderstand your request to "prove an artificial construct for humans to demarcate something that only matters to us"
In truth I had to look Demarcate up.
if to make a construct set the boundaries we wish, that matter to us. its called programing.
I'm not trying to be a jerk. but i did not want to let a lack of response mean i was mistaken.
What I meant by the "what if" is that we are looking to define what is "alive" and not what if we use bioengineering to blah blah blah. it was opening a road to a different destination.