Can a simple metal detector be modified to detect pipes at a higher voltage?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around modifying a simple metal detector to detect pipes buried several feet underground, specifically exploring the feasibility of using a higher voltage (100V) power supply instead of the typical 6-12V. The scope includes technical modifications, sensitivity improvements, and the effectiveness of different detection technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the circuit using an LM555 timer may not be suitable for a 100V input, as there is no 100V version of the timer and larger loops may be impractical for detecting pipes at depth.
  • Another participant questions whether the intention is to power the detector from a wall socket or to enhance sensitivity, indicating that increasing voltage alone may not improve detection capabilities.
  • Some participants argue that ground penetration depth is more dependent on frequency than voltage, suggesting that using a 120V circuit is not a practical solution.
  • There are suggestions that to enhance detection capabilities, a larger coil is necessary, and that research into commercially available options may be more beneficial than modifying a simple detector.
  • Participants mention that many underground pipes are made of non-metallic materials like PVC, which complicates detection efforts.
  • Some propose alternative methods for locating pipes, such as energizing them with a low voltage audio frequency to create a detectable magnetic field.
  • There is a mention of technologies like Ground Penetrating Radar and pulse induction as more effective means for detecting underground structures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of modifying the metal detector, with no consensus on the best approach. Some argue against the practicality of using higher voltage, while others emphasize the need for larger coils and alternative detection methods. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method for detecting underground pipes.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the proposed modifications, including the dependence on the type of pipes (metal vs. non-metal) and the need for a deeper understanding of detection technologies. There are also unresolved questions about the specific requirements for effective detection.

ryanuser
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am a civil engineering student undertaking a project to investigate the effect of pipes and pipelines beneath the ground on the urban city environment above. In order to proceed I am designating a simple metal detector. Due to low depth capability of all commercial metal detectors mine has to be able to detect pipes several feets under the ground.

Here I am seeking information on how I can possibly alter this simple metal detector circuit so it can be run using 100V input instead of 6-12V? Please consider the attached circuit.

Thank you

IMG_9917.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ryanuser said:
Hello, I am a civil engineering student undertaking a project to investigate the effect of pipes and pipelines beneath the ground on the urban city environment above. In order to proceed I am designating a simple metal detector. Due to low depth capability of all commercial metal detectors mine has to be able to detect pipes several feet under the ground.

Here I am seeking information on how I can possibly alter this simple metal detector circuit so it can be run using 100V input instead of 6-12V? Please consider the attached circuit.

Thank you
View attachment 208644
You get there from here.
That circuit uses a LM555 timer to create an audible signal that changes based (I presume) on that 10mH inductor - the only part that might be the detector loop.
There is no 100V version to the 555, and even if there was, it wouldn't help you.

The changes that you would need for detecting a pipe deep under ground might involve a much larger loop - assuming that it was practical at all - which it probably isn't.

The technology used for detecting thing like this Ground Penetrating Radar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground-penetrating_radar
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ACF and berkeman
ryanuser said:
Here I am seeking information on how I can possibly alter this simple metal detector circuit so it can be run using 100V input instead of 6-12V?
Do you mean you want to plug it into a 120Vrms wall socket to power it? Or are you just looking to make a more sensitive detector?
 
berkeman said:
Do you mean you want to plug it into a 120Vrms wall socket to power it? Or are you just looking to make a more sensitive detector?

I mean I want to plug it into a 120Vrms with much bigger loops, not necessarily making it more sensitive but making so it can detect at greater depth since pipes are few feet under ground.
 
ryanuser said:
I mean I want to plug it into a 120Vrms with much bigger loops, not necessarily making it more sensitive but making so it can detect at greater depth since pipes are few feet under ground.

seriously !?? you are well out of your depth here. ... maybe you should have done electrical eng rather than civil eng :wink:

ground penetration depth is more dependent on frequency than voltage in the coil ( tho it will have an effect)

using a 120V circuit is just incredibly silly
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995 and berkeman
ryanuser said:
I mean I want to plug it into a 120Vrms with much bigger loops, not necessarily making it more sensitive but making so it can detect at greater depth since pipes are few feet under ground.
As @davenn says, just trying to increase a voltage will not do much on its own. To make a more sensitive sensor, you would need to do a number of things all at once.

But of course, that has all been done by others before, so you should be looking at the standard commercially-available options. Can you post links to the most sensitive detectors you have found? Do you understand the reasons that ground-penetrating radar is used for this? Do you know what percentage of underground pipelines are metal versus (non-conducting) concrete or PVC?

And except for underground natural gas and petrol lines, you will get the best info by just contacting the appropriate utilities (water, sewage, etc) and asking for maps of the pipelines...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995
ryanuser said:
I mean I want to plug it into a 120Vrms with much bigger loops, not necessarily making it more sensitive but making so it can detect at greater depth since pipes are few feet under ground.
You can use a 5V supply to power a device that is plenty sensitive enough. In any such devices that are available and mains powered, the very first thing in the circuit is a voltage converter (power supply) to give the actual measurement circuit a low voltage DC supply (5V or 12V). Isn't that what you have for all your personal electronic devices? (Plug in the wall that gives you 5V.)
To detect stuff at significant depths you will definitely need a pretty large coil - about the same diameter as the depth you are looking (imo). You have to plot the results over a large grid with long baselines and observe peaks and troughs in your signal output.
If this is a pukka project then you will of course need to search for information about the topic. PF cannot be relied on to have a "Tame Detectorist" on tap. 'We' have a very broad experience of electronics and our opinions are (often) pretty well informed and we are (so it seems) fairly expert at using Google and other search engines.
There is absolutely no point in launching out into building something as simple as you propose (I think the circuit you posted is the same as the very first Google hit I found.). You first need to find out what sort of specification is required and spend a long time on research before lifting a soldering iron!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-8-10_21-5-19.png
    upload_2017-8-10_21-5-19.png
    73.4 KB · Views: 829
  • #10
ryanuser said:
I am a civil engineering student undertaking a project to investigate the effect of pipes and pipelines beneath the ground on the urban city environment above.
Surely, if the pipes effect the “urban city environment above” they must be detectable.
If you cannot detect the pipes, then how can they effect the city environment above?

You are assuming that pipes are made from metal. Plastic is now more common.
What effect do you expect the pipes to have? Can you use that effect to detect them?

Underground pipes and cables are usually traced by energising them with a low voltage audio frequency. The AC current that flows along the conductor causes a magnetic field that can be picked up with a hand held loop and detected with a tuned receiver. Changing the orientation of the loop increases the accuracy of the tracking.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and jim hardy
  • #11
Detecting their presence is not the same as locating their position etc..
It is a valid idea to correlate the presence of pipes etc. with conditions on the surface - drainage, plant growth etc.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K