Building a Simple metal detector circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a simple metal detector circuit, focusing on various circuit configurations and their effectiveness in detecting metal, particularly with a steel pendulum. Participants explore different approaches, including RL and RLC circuits, as well as alternative detection methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using an RL circuit with a copper coil air core to detect changes in voltage drop across a resistor as a steel pendulum passes nearby, but finds the results unsatisfactory due to minimal voltage change.
  • Another participant suggests a topology involving two oscillators at around 250KHz, where one is a reference oscillator and the other is an LC oscillator that detects metal by frequency changes, producing an audible tone from the frequency difference.
  • A different participant describes a metal detector design using a 5" diameter coil and a 4046 phase lock loop, noting that it tracks frequency changes caused by nearby metal and outputs a voltage that varies with frequency, while also emphasizing the importance of a stable power supply.
  • One participant questions the initial approach and suggests considering optical detection as an alternative method.
  • Another participant expresses a restriction to using a copper wire coil for detection.
  • A later reply references an old book that contains a circuit design from the 1970s, claiming it worked effectively at the time and recommending it as a resource for understanding phase locked loops.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and approaches to building a metal detector, with no consensus on a single effective method. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best design or technique.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations based on the technology they are willing to use, such as a preference for older methods or specific components like copper wire coils. There are also unresolved questions about the effectiveness of various circuit designs and the assumptions underlying their proposed methods.

pashnoy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I am new at this so sorry if i get the format wrong.

Im trying to build a basic metal detector that will respond when a steel pendulum passes nearby. A simple response is all that is needed right now.

I thought of this:
Building a RL circuit with a copper coil air core. placing a m/meter over the resistor and reading that its (the resistors) voltage drop should lower as the inductance of the coil changes with the pendulum passing near to it. (and the flux having a low impedance to pass through )

this didnt work well enough as the change over the resistor drop was minimal!
(the source was set at 10Vp-p and a high frequency)

I then thought to make an RLC circuit in resonance and using the same logic only that the drop should change dramatically (what i need!) with a slight change in impedance.
this too did not yield a clear enough result.

any tips for improving this design or a new simple design all together?
thanx
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A pretty sensitive metal detector topology is having two oscillators at around 250KHz. One oscillator is a reference oscillator and it's shielded. The other one is an LC oscillator like the Colpitts with the inductor being the main pick up coil used to detect metal.

When a metal is brought close, the LC oscillator will slightly change frequency. Then subtract the reference oscillator frequency from the LC oscillator frequency using a mixer. The difference will be in audio range which can be heard as a pitch or tone.
 
I (sorta) invented a little metal detector -- more likely I stole most of it from some unspecified online source -- for my robots using a 5" diameter 40 turn coil that calcs out to being about 50uH. The coil makes an oscillator osculate and that is feed into a 4046 phase lock loop which tracks the slight changes in frequency caused by nearby metal thingies and puts out a voltage that changes with frequency:

http://www.etantdonnes.com/ROBOCAR/doc/hardware/RoboOther_sch.png"

YMMV on sensitivity and such, but it's a place to start. I found that the 4046 is _extremely_ sensitive to supply voltage, so add a good regulator to the power -- the built-in Zener diode is just not up to the task when the supply is near the cutoff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pashnoy said:
Hi guys, I am new at this so sorry if i get the format wrong.

Im trying to build a basic metal detector that will respond when a steel pendulum passes nearby. A simple response is all that is needed right now.

I thought of this:
Building a RL circuit with a copper coil air core. placing a m/meter over the resistor and reading that its (the resistors) voltage drop should lower as the inductance of the coil changes with the pendulum passing near to it. (and the flux having a low impedance to pass through )

this didnt work well enough as the change over the resistor drop was minimal!
(the source was set at 10Vp-p and a high frequency)

I then thought to make an RLC circuit in resonance and using the same logic only that the drop should change dramatically (what i need!) with a slight change in impedance.
this too did not yield a clear enough result.

any tips for improving this design or a new simple design all together?
thanx

Can you use optical detection instead?
 
I am restained to using a copper wire coil in the detection of the metal
 
if you're willing to use 1970-ish technology, try the circuit on page 68-69 of this old book (PDF page 70).
Back before microcomputers I built one and it worked as well as store bought detectors of the day.
http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/signetics/_dataBooks/1972_Signetics_PLL_Applications.pdf

the book is an excellent introduction to phase locked loops. I'd recommend you download and print a copy.

old jim
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K