I Can a Single Observation Determine Retrograde Motion?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter cptolemy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Retrograde
AI Thread Summary
A single observation of a planet's geocentric coordinates is insufficient to determine if it is in retrograde motion, as velocity information is also required. At least two observations are necessary to calculate the planet's motion accurately. Additionally, knowing only the position does not provide insights into the orbit's eccentricity or inclination. While precise measurements might yield some data, such as Doppler shifts or solar wind effects, they are not definitive for retrograde analysis. Accurate orbital determination requires multiple parameters and observations.
cptolemy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Hi

I was wondering: if we know the geocentric coordinates of the sun and one planet (longitude and distance) in one instant only, can we calculate/know mathematically if the planet is in retrograde motion or not? Or must we have 2 observations?

Clear skies

CPtolemy
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If the only information you have is the position, then no. You'd need to know the velocity as well, which requires at least two measurements.
 
cptolemy said:
Hi

I was wondering: if we know the geocentric coordinates of the sun and one planet (longitude and distance) in one instant only, can we calculate/know mathematically if the planet is in retrograde motion or not? Or must we have 2 observations?

Clear skies

CPtolemy

If you know just the coordinates then no. Also would not know if it was eccentric orbit or the inclination. Keplarian elements:
Given an inertial frame of reference and an arbitrary epoch (a specified point in time), exactly six parameters are necessary to unambiguously define an arbitrary and unperturbed orbit.

With extremely accurate measurements you might get some information. Perhaps a Doppler shift. There should be some sort of drag through the solar wind. Maybe evidence of tides.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top