Can a Stiffness Matrix Be Antisymmetric in Neutrally Stable Structures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pooty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Stiffness
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the stiffness matrix in the context of finite element analysis, particularly focusing on whether a stiffness matrix can be antisymmetric in neutrally stable structures. Participants explore definitions of stiffness coefficients and the implications of boundary conditions on matrix assembly.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of symmetry in the stiffness matrix for neutrally stable structures and wonders if there are special cases that allow for an antisymmetric matrix.
  • Another participant suggests considering the Muller-Breslau theorem to understand the symmetry of the stiffness matrix and the relationship between the definitions of stiffness coefficients.
  • A participant clarifies that both definitions of stiffness coefficients provided are correct, depending on the perspective of cause and effect.
  • A participant reports successfully achieving symmetry in their stiffness matrix after considering the suggestions and discusses their challenges in visualizing the effects of loads and displacements on a rigid beam with given boundary conditions.
  • The participant describes their specific setup involving a horizontal rigid beam with springs and the degrees of freedom related to vertical and rotational displacements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on whether an antisymmetric stiffness matrix is possible in neutrally stable structures, and participants express differing views on the definitions of stiffness coefficients and their implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of stiffness coefficients and the conditions under which the stiffness matrix is assembled, which may not be universally applicable. The specific boundary conditions and their effects on the stiffness matrix are also noted but not resolved.

Pooty
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
So, I am trying to assemble the Stiffness Matrix in my Finite Element Analysis course (Structures) and I keep coming out with a stiffness matrix that is not symmetric. I learned that for any neutrally stable structure, the stiffness matrix must be symmetric. Are there special cases that I am not taking into account that may allow for it to be antisymmetric? Thanks.

Also, this might seem sort of redundant but I actually look at these two definitions in a different light. Maybe someone could shed some light on the definition of a stiffness coefficient for me but I was given 2 definitions.

Kij

Definition 1: The Force at i caused by a unit displacement at j
Definition 2: The Force at i required to cause a unit displacement at j

If someone is really good at setting up stiffness matrices I would love to post what I got.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the Muller-Breslau theorem,(that the deflection at A due to a force P at B is equal to the deflection at B due to the same force P at A) and maybe that will reveal (1) the symmetry of the stiffness matrix and (2) the definitions you give follow from each other? That's just a suggestion for you to consider. I may be wrong though.
 
Did you assemble boundary conditions into your stiffness matrix yet? Or not yet?

Both stiffness coefficient definitions you listed appear correct. It just depends on what you consider to be the cause, and effect. In definition 1, the displacement is arbitrarily said to be the cause. In definition 2, the force is arbitrarily said to be the cause. It is two ways to state the same thing.
 
Pongo, Thanks. I got the symmetry to work out. I will have to look at the problem in the way you are talking about to see if that makes if visually easier. My problem is visualizing how the freebody reacts to imposed loads and displacements.

NVN, The boundary conditions were set for me. It was a horizontal rigid beam of length 2L. Spring with constant k1 at the far left and spring with constant k2 in the middle.

I was told that my DOF's were vertical displacement at the left end and rotational displacement at the left end. I had a hard time picturing that when I displace the left end 1 unit in the vertical direction the whole beam raises as opposed to just the left side. I figured it out and got the K11 stiffness to be k1 + k2. It was a 2x2 stiffness matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K