Can an Expanding Ball in an Ideal Fluid Affect Distant Areas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asheg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Fluid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of a growing ball in an ideal fluid, questioning whether this scenario contradicts the fluid's incompressibility. It is suggested that if the fluid is truly incompressible, distant areas would instantly sense changes due to the ball's expansion. However, if compressibility is considered, acoustic waves might propagate from the ball. The conversation also touches on the Navier-Stokes equations, emphasizing that the zero divergence condition applies to fluid parcels, not including the volume of the expanding ball. Overall, the interaction between the ball's growth and the fluid's properties raises complex questions about wave propagation and fluid dynamics.
asheg
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi every one,
consider ideal fluid claiming the space all over, and a ball in it which is becoming larger and larger with radius of zero at the begin. Is such a situation possible? Doesn't it in contradiction with ideality (in-compressibility of the fluid). If it's not so, Do places far away from the ball surface sense any change? Is there any wave propagation kind equation for ideal fluids.
Are Div(v)=0 and Curl(v)=0 sufficient for this problem.
(Please give me hints and not the result or solution, since it's on me)
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if the space is infinite, then there should be no problem with incompressibility. On the other hand, if you don't specify incompressibility (this depends on what you consider an "ideal" fluid) then of course a finite volume could accommodate a growing ball.

If the fluid is truly incompressible, then places far away from the ball would instantly "feel" the divergence. If there is some compressibility, then you might have acoustic waves radiating from the ball. If the fluid is stratified, then the disturbance might excite internal gravity waves as well.

Lots of possible results. What are you envisioning?
 
Thanks for your reply.
I think if the incompressible be what you say (changes propagates instantly all over space)
then the velocity distribution would be:
V(R,t) = t^2/R^2
t is time
R is Radius from center

Because the radius of ball at time t would be t and the velocity of fluid there would be 1 same as velocity of ball's surface.

But according to navier stokes it is different:
Div (v) = 0
d/dt(v) + v.Grad(v) = Grad(P)/rho

How one can get the answer from above equation? How to calculate P?
 
The zero divergence (solenoidal) condition is for the fluid parcels themselves. If you postulate a growing "ball" of something in the middle of the fluid, then of course you can't include its volume in your fluid mass conservation. The fluid on all sides of the "ball" continues to satisfy div v = 0.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top