Can an n-dimensional object fit entirely in n-1 dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Einstein's Cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d 3d Space
Einstein's Cat
Messages
182
Reaction score
2
I am concerned that this question may instead be a philosophical one although if it it mathematical, any insights would be very appreciated. The question is this; could an object of N dimensions exist entirely in N-1 dimensions? In other words, could an infinitely flat object have 3 degrees of freedom and also be able to fit entirely in 2D space? Thank you and please excuse any naivety
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe , OP, you want to know if an n-dimensional object can be embedded in (n-1)-dimensions? Or are there other types of properties of the object that you want to preserve? I think you can say no for n-spheres (I think a corollary of Borsuk-Ulam theorem) and for ##\mathbb R^n ##, but I don't know of a more general result. But I think the answer ultimately depends on what (types of) intrinsic properties of the object you want to preserve in the lower dimensions: topology, geometry, etc.? Interesting question, though.
In one sense of dimension, the answer is no: if you see the dimension n of an object as the minimal number of coordinates of a point needed to uniquely identify each point in the space, then the answer would be (is) no.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Einstein's Cat
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
740
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top