I Can an object be both a black hole and not a black hole?

friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
According to Special Relativity, objects moving fast have more mass than objects at rest. So what if there is an object having a mass density near that required to create a black hole. Now if it were moving fast enough as well, it would gain enough mass density to become black hole. But to the observer moving in its frame of reference it would not. How can an object both be a black hole and not be a black hole? To an observer moving fast enough, every object would seem to be a black how, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
friend said:
To an observer moving fast enough, every object would seem to be a black hole, right?
Not right.
A black hole forms or not according to how large the rest mass is, not the relativistic mass.
 
friend said:
According to Special Relativity, objects moving fast have more mass than objects at rest.
This statement is common, but wrong. Moving objects have more relativistic mass, but their rest mass is unchanged. Modern usage (i.e. pretty much any paper in the last half century) is that "mass" means rest mass, and relativistic mass is pretty much never used. It's just total energy divided by ##c^2## anyway, and calling it mass leads to confusion of the type you have here.

Pop sci is more concerned wigh sounding cool and less concerned with clear communication, so has yet to catch up with that.
friend said:
How can an object both be a black hole and not be a black hole?
It can't. Gravity in relativity does not depend on relativistic mass, and people assuming it is basically Newtonian gravity with relativistic mass plugged in is one more reason to abandon the concept. The source term for gravity in relativity is the stress-energy tensor, which includes mass and other terms related to momentum and pressure. But they don't simply add to the mass in any naive way.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top