Can Any Inner Product Be Defined in Infinite Dimensional Vector Spaces?

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,
I need a clarification:I read in E. Butkov's book that an inner product may always be imposed on a finite dimensional linear vector space in a variety of ways...Butkov does not explain the point...Can anyone please clarify this?

I wonder what it would be for an infinite dimensional case...As we all know that Hilbert space used in quantum mechanics is an infinite dimensional space. Yet all the books almost inherently define the scalar product in Hilbert space.Is there any hinge in the story?

-Thanks,

Neel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, a Hilbert space by definition must have an inner product defined on it. (A Hilbert space is a vector space over the real or complex numbers with a complete inner product.)

Secondly, in a finite-dimensional space, if you fix any positive-definite matrix M, then the expression \langle x,y \rangle = x^{\dagger}My defines an inner product.

The usual dot product is a special case when M is the identity matrix.
 
Thank you
 

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Decomposition into irreps of compact Lie group'

When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Shouldn't this definition of a metric include a square root?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Orthogonality of Eigenvectors of Linear Operator and its Adjoint
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Do Two Eigenvectors Form a Hilbert Space with Their Inner Product?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Understanding Hilbert Vector Spaces
Replies
3
Views
2K
I About the definition of vector space of infinite dimension
Replies
18
Views
3K
I Inner product vs dot/scalar product
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Dimension and solution to matrix-vector product
Replies
4
Views
3K
Is Every Norm on a Finite-Dimensional Vector Space Induced by an Inner Product?
Replies
3
Views
5K
MHB What Makes Hilbert Space So Confusing?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Interpretation of direct product of Hilbert spaces
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top