Can Any Periodic Function Be Decomposed into Sines and Cosines?

rakeshbs
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Fourier series is a way to express a periodic function as a sum of complex exponentials or sines and cosines.. Is there actually a proof for the fact tat a periodic function can be split up into sines and cosines or complex exponentials?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is fairly easy to show that any integrable periodic function can be approximated arbitrarily well by a sum of sines and cosines. The Fourier series is the limit of those approximations as the "error" goes to 0- except on a set of measure 0 for dis-continuous functions. I might point out that the other way is what's hard. It can be shown that some perfectly valid Fourier series converge to non-(Riemann)-integrable functions. That was why Lebesque integration had to be invented.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top