Can Any Photon Above Ionization Energy Provide Arbitrary K.E. to Electrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvin490
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Energy
AI Thread Summary
Electrons can only absorb energy from photons in discrete amounts that correspond to energy level differences within an atom. In the photoelectric effect, however, a photon can ionize an electron, allowing for the emission of kinetic energy (K.E.) that can vary continuously. This means that any photon with energy exceeding the ionization threshold can impart an arbitrary amount of K.E. to the electron, with the excess energy contributing to the electron's kinetic energy. In metals, the concept of discrete energy levels is replaced by energy bands, leading to a continuous spectrum of kinetic energy for emitted electrons. This phenomenon is explored in photoemission spectroscopy, which analyzes the kinetic energy and momentum of photoemitted electrons.
kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
Electrons absorbed from a photon can only be in discrete amount and match the energy difference between different energy level. However, in photoelectric effect a photon can ionize an electron and give K.E. to the electrons. As K.E. can be any arbitrary amount instead of discrete, does it mean that any photon with energy greater than the ionizing energy can be absorbed by an electron in any arbitrary amount (all the excess energy becomes K.E. of electron)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*subscribe*

Thanks for the good question!
 
kelvin490 said:
Electrons absorbed from a photon can only be in discrete amount and match the energy difference between different energy level. However, in photoelectric effect a photon can ionize an electron and give K.E. to the electrons. As K.E. can be any arbitrary amount instead of discrete, does it mean that any photon with energy greater than the ionizing energy can be absorbed by an electron in any arbitrary amount (all the excess energy becomes K.E. of electron)?

A few misunderstandings here:

1. The "discrete" energy levels of a system (not JUST for the electrons) is due to the nature of the system itself. In an atom, this is the energy level OF THE ATOM, which is manifested by the state the occupation of the electrons within that atom. So it has to do with, mathematically, the "boundary conditions" of the system.

2. In a metal, this discreteness is practically gone. That is why, instead of discrete energy levels, we talk about energy BANDS in solids such as metals, semiconductors, insulators, etc. There are no more discrete energy levels.

3. The vacuum state is one such continuous level. So in a photoelectric effect (as in metals) and in photoionization (which is the atomic/molecular equivalent of the photoelectric effect), if the energy source (such as photons) has energy greater than some threshold, then yes, there will be a continuous spectrum of kinetic energy of the emitted electrons. This is what we study in photoemission spectroscopy, the kinetic energy and momentum spectrum of the photoemitted electrons.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top