MHB Can any twice-differentiable function satisfy these conditions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
No twice-differentiable function can satisfy the conditions \(y(-1) = -1\), \(y(1) = 1\), and the integral condition involving \(y'\). The analysis using the Euler-Lagrange equation leads to an inconsistent system, indicating that no such function can achieve a minimum or maximum under these constraints. Attempts to derive a function result in \(y = -\frac{c}{2x} + d\), but this form does not yield a valid twice-differentiable function on the interval \([-1, 1]\). Specifically, the function \(y = 1/x\) fails to meet the twice-differentiability requirement within the specified interval. Consequently, the conclusion is that no twice-differentiable function exists that meets the given criteria.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
I want to show for all twice differentialable functions there are no functions that take a min or max with the following conditions \(y(-1) = -1\), \(y(1) = 1\), and
\[
\int_{-1}^1x^2y^{'2}dx.
\]

From the E-L eq, we have \(2x^2y' = c\).
So
\[
y(x) = -\frac{c}{6} + d
\]
Using the conditions, we get
\[
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{1}{6} & 1 & -1\\
-\frac{1}{6} & 1 & 1
\end{pmatrix}\Rightarrow
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{1}{6} & 1 & -1\\
0 & 2 & 0
\end{pmatrix}
\]
Therefore, we have an inconsistent system since no two tuples satisfy the bottom equation.
Thus, no twice differentiable function with the given conditions takes on a minimum or maximum.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think from $2x^{2}y'=c$, the next step would be
$$y'= \frac{c}{2x^{2}}=(c/2)x^{-2} \quad \implies \quad y=- \frac{c}{2x}+d.$$
 
Ackbach said:
I think from $2x^{2}y'=c$, the next step would be
$$y'= \frac{c}{2x^{2}}=(c/2)x^{-2} \quad \implies \quad y=- \frac{c}{2x}+d.$$

Not everyone can integrate but after that error, the result analysis would be the same correct?
 
If you just apply the BC's, you might have
\begin{align*}
1&=-c+d\\
-1&=c+d.
\end{align*}
From here, you could say that $d=0$ and $c=-1$, and hence $y=1/x$. The problem is that this function is not in the collection of functions in which you were interested - at least not on the interval $[-1,1]$. That is, $1/x$ is not twice-differentiable on $[-1,1]$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top