Can anyone recommend a book that explains math from the ground up?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theneedtoknow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Ground
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for a contemporary mathematics book that outlines basic axioms and derives concepts from them, akin to Euclid's Elements. The initial suggestion is Russell and Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica," but it is met with strong criticism for its density and perceived irrelevance to practical mathematics. Instead, the conversation shifts to recommending more accessible texts focused on specific mathematical topics, particularly Category and Topos Theory. Two suggested books are "Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic" by Richard Goldblatt and "Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction" by John Bell, both praised for their affordability and rigor. However, caution is advised for readers without extensive training in rigorous thinking, as the material may seem abstract.
theneedtoknow
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
I mean, a book that states the basic axioms of contemporary mathematics and then proceeds to prove/derive things based on those axims. Something like a contemporary mathematics version of Euclid's Elements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That actually sounds like exactly what I am looking for! I am going to order me a copy, thank you very much!
 
No! You would be making a huuuuuuuuuuge mistake by buying that book. Almost no one reads that book, not even mathematicians! It is dense and irrelevant to any mathematics you will want to do. Don't waste your money on it.
Rather buy books that deal with the specific topic you want to learn.
 
A book on Category/Topos Theory could serve as a mathematical foundation. From it you can create various logic systems (including intuitionist logic) as well as locally-true set theories. Two inexpensive books that cover this are

Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic by Richard Goldblatt
Toposes and Local Set Theories: An Introduction by John Bell

Both are published by Dover, a publisher that produces rigorous, high-quality texts for a very affordable price. I highly recommend Topoi, but unless you've had an extensive training in rigorous thinking it may come off as pointlessly abstract and useless. However, if you approach it with no expectations you will gain a deeply profound view of mathematics.

Good luck.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
50
Views
16K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Back
Top