Can anyone recommend Calclus Made Easy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bassir
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the suitability of "Calculus Made Easy" by Sylvanus Thompson for beginners in calculus, particularly for those preparing for the AP Physics C: Mechanics exam. Users express mixed opinions on the book's effectiveness. Some praise it as a valuable resource, noting that even renowned physicist Richard Feynman appreciated it for review purposes. The 1910 edition is highlighted as particularly strong, with one user stating it could be the only book needed for learning calculus. However, there are concerns regarding the more recent edition, co-authored by Martin Gardner, which some feel may confuse beginners rather than aid their understanding. Despite these differing views, both editions remain available, with the 1910 version being in the public domain.
Bassir
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
I'm planning on self-studying for the AP Physics C: Mechanics examination, which has some basic calculus, so I'm contemplating the book Calculus Made Easy by Sylvanus Thompson.

Can anyone recommend this book to a beginner to Calculus with some background in algebra, and trigonometry?

How good is the book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What one fool can do, any other can!

It's a great book. Feynman used it too.
 
It's good for review or to shine on things you have a difficulty with; not necessarily to learn new material.
 
The great mathwonk LOVED the 1910 version of Calculus Made Easy, he said that it's pretty much the only book you'll need to learn Calc.

However, his opinion about the recent edition (with Martin Gardner) is the exact opposite.
 
I tutored a peer that was using Calculus Made Easy (not sure of the edition) and it seemed to confuse and mislead her a bit. I guess it's just a tidbit to consider.
 
I love the book! Leave the real analysis to books on real analysis. I have to stronglu disagree with Mathwonk, though(I have access to both versions, my dad has the 1910 version, and I have the 2008 one). The updated version(Gardner) did not change the style of the book, just the language(modern notation, etc.) I prefer Gardner for this reason. However, both versions are in print, I believe.

EDIT: Since this book(the 1910 edition) is in public domain, it will not be against the rules to post a link to it: http://djm.cc/library/Calculus_Made_Easy_Thompson.pdf
 
Last edited:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Back
Top