Can anyone tell me how impurity in superconductors changes the Tc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mojo0529
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductors
mojo0529
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've search plenty of papers,but I still got no idea about this.Can anyone give me some clues?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

Without being an expert in the field, superconductivity comes from the fact that electrons move more freely than in a conventional conductor. If you add some impurities in this material, you change the potential of electrons to move freely, by having variation in the lattice.

Like I said, this is really not my field. Cheers
 
Staying with conventional superconductors: non-magnetic impurities don't do much, and can in fact raise things like the critical field/current. Magnetic impurities tend to cause problems, and can destroy the superconductivity entirely.
 
For example: experiment for ordinary metals (1/2,... filled zone)

Superconductivity in amorphous and microcrystalline transition-metal alloys*
W. L. Johnson and S. J. Poon
In: Journal of Applied Physics. Vol. 46, No. 4. April 1975
W. M. Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109 (Received 2 October 1974)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
... It is found that the transition temperature of an amorphous phase obtained by liquid quenching is always less than that of one of the related crystalline phases...
Since 1930 years Kikoin-Kitaygorodski-Chapnick empirical rule is known:
Almost 90-95% superconductors are hole-like (Hall coefficient just above Tc is positive)
See diagram
tcvshall.gif


at http://physics.ucsd.edu/~jorge/bcs.html

See more about Kitaygorodski-Chapnick empirical rule at
"[URL theory of superconductivity: the world’s largest Madoff scheme?
J. E. Hirsch
Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, CA 92093-0319[/URL]If impuruties make hole effective mass more in value (while Fermi momentum is constant), than Tc will be more in value (as a rule!).

But in ordinary metal impurities in some cases can change even the sign of effective mass! And in that case superconductivity may be destroyed completely.

Electron and hole conductivities compete in most metals, so it is hard to predict exactly Tc change.

In HTSC picture is more complex.
 

Attachments

  • tcvshall.gif
    tcvshall.gif
    6.3 KB · Views: 466
Last edited by a moderator:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Back
Top