Can anyone tell me why this counter string theory is wrong

lord of time
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
counter to string theory

changed name of post
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My first impression is that you made the mistake of assuming the sun is in the same place in all universes, and so the force will all be in the same direction, and not just cancel out.
 


The counter to string theory, also known as the anti-string theory or the anti-string movement, is a group of scientists and researchers who reject the fundamental principles of string theory. They argue that string theory lacks empirical evidence and is too mathematical and abstract to be considered a legitimate scientific theory.

Some of the main criticisms of string theory include its inability to make testable predictions, its reliance on unobservable dimensions, and its failure to unify all fundamental forces of nature. Additionally, the high number of possible solutions within string theory makes it difficult to determine which one accurately describes our universe.

However, there are also many scientists and researchers who support string theory and believe it has the potential to provide a deeper understanding of the universe. They argue that the lack of empirical evidence is due to the fact that string theory deals with extremely small scales and requires advanced technology to be tested.

In the end, it is important to remember that science is a constantly evolving field and theories are subject to change as new evidence and advancements are made. While the counter to string theory presents valid criticisms, it is ultimately up to the scientific community to evaluate and determine the validity of string theory.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Back
Top