Can Anything Travel Faster Than the Speed of Light?

likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4
simple question - Can light or anything else, travel faster than 3x10^5 km/sec?
If not, why is there a limit on max speed particles/photos can travel at?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From wikipedia on Special Relativity:

Special relativity reveals that c is not just the velocity of a certain phenomenon, namely the propagation of electromagnetic radiation (light) - but rather a fundamental feature of the way space and time are unified as spacetime. A consequence of this is that it is impossible for any particle that has mass to be accelerated to the speed of light.
 
A good way to think about it that I recently came across is that everything is moving at a constant speed. That is, every object has a 4-velocity and a 4-speed of c (speed of light). A 4-velocity is a 4-dimensional vector where the first index is time and the last three are space.

Examples:
Object at rest: v = (c,0,0,0)
Photon: v=(0,c,0,0) *or any vector where the length of the spatial part is c and time is 0

So the question isn't "why is there a maximum speed?", its really "why is everything moving through space-time at a constant speed?".
 
michael879 said:
A good way to think about it that I recently came across is that everything is moving at a constant speed. That is, every object has a 4-velocity and a 4-speed of c (speed of light). A 4-velocity is a 4-dimensional vector where the first index is time and the last three are space.

Examples:
Object at rest: v = (c,0,0,0)
Photon: v=(0,c,0,0) *or any vector where the length of the spatial part is c and time is 0

So the question isn't "why is there a maximum speed?", its really "why is everything moving through space-time at a constant speed?".

For a photon, its tangent vector has the form
Photon: v=(c,c,0,0), for example, so that c^2-(c^2+0^2+0^2)=0^2.

Here's my comment on the "speed through spacetime" idea:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=565681#post565681
 
Last edited:
robphy said:
For a photon, its tangent vector has the form
Photon: v=(c,c,0,0), for example, so that c^2-(c^2+0^2+0^2)=0^2.

Here's my comment on the "speed through spacetime" idea:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=565681#post565681

my bad, I forgot that detail: mass-less particles have 4-speed of 0 while massive particles have 4-speed of c.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top