Can Astronomers Predict when a star will explode?

  • Thread starter Thread starter !Jon Snow!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
AI Thread Summary
Astronomers can predict when a star will explode, but the accuracy of these predictions varies significantly based on timeframes and the specific characteristics of the star. While some stars, like Eta Carinae, can be estimated to explode within a few hundred thousand years, the uncertainty can span thousands of years, making precise short-term predictions impossible. Identifying potential supernova candidates relies on analyzing stellar types and their positions on the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. For example, Betelgeuse is nearing the end of its life, showing observable fluctuations that hint at its impending collapse. However, accurately measuring core fusion processes to predict exact timelines remains beyond current technological capabilities.
!Jon Snow!
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Or is it too soon?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In general the answer is "yes" and it is done all the time but it largely depends on your required level of accuracy and pov as a human who generally lives less than 100 years.

If a star's lifetime is measured even in one billion (1,000,000,000 or 10^9) ridiculously short for the vast majority of stars for the purpose of illustrating the vastness in time about which we are discussing, even a plus or minus 1% level of accuracy is an unimaginable number of human lifetimes.

Considering you specified "explode" this rules out those longer lasting stars of less mass. Even Eta Carinae which is calculated to have been formed around 4 x 10^6 years ago and is expected to explode in approximately 10^5 years, has "wiggle room" at even that 1% degree of accuracy (and I doubt anyone claims such high degrees of accuracies) is 1000 years, perhaps some 10-15 human lifetimes.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi Jon

what is your definition of being able to predict a specific star to go supernova ?

if you mean within the next year, 10, 10,000 or 1 million years, then no
The life cycles of stars are just too long
Predicting that we will see a supernova in our Milky Way in the next 50 - 100 has possibilities

OTOH, predicting which stars would be candidates for becoming a supernova is a little easier
This is done by looking at the type of star. Observing their spectra and seeing where they would be placed
on the main sequence chart
See the Hertzsprung - Russell Diagram

cheers
Dave
 
For a star to explode it has to be at least 3.5 solar masses (size of our sun)
Betelgeuse I think is a good example
http://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov/news-display.cfm?News_ID=560
Although Astronomers can't predict exactly when it will happen, they believe Betelgeuse is nearing the end of its lifespan. Betelgeuse is shrinking and even though they don't know why exactly, it's speculated to be a series of partial collapses. These collapses happen when a red giant burns out its hydrogen fuel and switches to other elements like helium and carbon.
By my understanding, only through observed fluctuations such as this can astronomers begin to have an idea of a range of when the individual star might die.
 
Well, if you could detect silicon fusion occurring in the core of a star, you would know it only has about a day left before it goes boom. Similarly, if oxygen burning was occurring, it would have 6-12 months to live. The trick is being able to discern the nature of fusion occurring in the core of a star. Since the temperature required for either form of burning to occur is known, a way to measure the core temperature of a star would be helpful. Unfortunately, that too is beyond our current capabilities.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top