Can Automatic Link Title Resolution Be Improved on arXiv.org?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Direct links to PDF files on arXiv.org are labeled '403 Forbidden,' although they still lead to the intended documents when clicked. This issue arises from a failure in automatic URL encoding into UBBC, affecting how links are displayed in forum posts. Users noted that quoting the link reveals the underlying problem with the formatting. The discussion highlights the need for improvements in the automatic link title resolution feature to prevent confusion. Addressing this hiccup could enhance user experience on the platform.
StevieTNZ
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
873
Hi there,

A direct link to a PDF file on arXiv.org results in the link being named '403 Forbidden'. Not sure what's going on; however clicking on the link takes you to the intended PDF.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StevieTNZ said:
A direct link to a PDF file on arXiv.org results in the link being named '403 Forbidden'. Not sure what's going on; however clicking on the link takes you to the intended PDF.

So the link doesn't work, but it works?

Can't say I understand what's the problem.
 
StevieTNZ said:
Hi there,

A direct link to a PDF file on arXiv.org results in the link being named '403 Forbidden'. Not sure what's going on; however clicking on the link takes you to the intended PDF.

If you're referring to something like this post: Physicist disentangles 'Schrodinger's cat' debate - Single Post

the weirdness is actually in the post itself - try quoting it and look at the raw bbcode to see what's wrong and how to fix it.
 
OK, it is automatic URL encoding into UBBC that fails. Try to post just a link to pdf: [noparse]http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.1673.pdf[/noparse] and it will be converted to

Code:
[noparse]http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.1673.pdf[/noparse]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The current format is:
Code:
[noparse]As per the title, the article is [url="http://phys.org/news/2013-08-physicist-disentangles-schrodinger-cat-debate.html"]Physicist disentangles 'Schrodinger's cat' debate[/url]

The paper is http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.1673.pdf[/quote][/noparse]
 
Back to normal. I was testing a automatic link title resolution feature. Obviously there is a hiccup.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Sticky
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Sticky
2
Replies
97
Views
48K
Back
Top