Can basic quantum physics explain the TARDIS from doctor who

AI Thread Summary
Basic quantum physics cannot fully explain the traits of the TARDIS, excluding its consciousness and living metal properties. The concept of "wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff" is presented as the fictional framework for the TARDIS's functionality. Theoretical discussions about the TARDIS creating replicas of itself during teleportation do not align with existing scientific theories. The show prioritizes entertainment over scientific accuracy, making it challenging to reconcile its elements with a scientific perspective. Additionally, the thread's content does not adhere to the subforum's rules.
Clever boy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can basic quantum physics explain all of the traits of the tardis other than the consciousness and living metal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The branch of physics that explain the TARDIS is called wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey stuff.
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens, Evo and Enigman
That is true. But wouldn't it be at least theoretically possible that the tardis creates an exact replica of itself in at its desired destination, switches places in Tim and space repeatedly causing the ree ree reee reee reee bum when it teleports
 
If by theoretically you mean any existing theory, then no. The show is not really science fiction, in that it never cared much for the drama to be grounded in anything other than the rule of cool. If you try to square it with a scientific mindset, you'll only get frustrated.
 
Nope, and this thread doesn't fit within the subforum rules.
 
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?

Similar threads

Back
Top