Can BEC experiments shed light on the mysteries of quantum gravity?

lark
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
Might BEC give insight into how quantum gravity works? comment?
Laura
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this what you are thinking about?:
Wikipedia said:
Vortices in Bose–Einstein condensates are also currently the subject of analogue gravity research, studying the possibility of modeling black holes and their related phenomena in such environments in the lab.

I wouldn't expect any fundamental insight on quantum gravity from bose-einstein condensates.

Torquil
 
No, I didn't mean analogs of black holes ...

But, something like this: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1002/1002.2962v1.pdf

and http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0911/0911.1020v1.pdf

I was really asking whether BEC, being large scale quantum systems, might be used to test theories of quantum gravity. The above papers being an example, although I was wondering if anybody else can add more insight than can be found in a quick google search.

Laura
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the references; it sure is interesting! After a quick look at the BEC article, there are a couple of points I would like to raise:

Ref: http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2962

1) There doesn't seem to be any infrared cutoff on the effect contributing to the energy shift for the compact BEC trap. Shouldn't low frequency fluctuations of the gravitational field give no contribution since they simply "move the whole experiment around"?

2) In eq.6, shouldn't there be an upper limit for the value of 'r'? Or stated differently, surely the contributions in the <hh> factor here should contain only Fourier components with wavelengths larger than the value 'r'? This should be a much more restrictive ultraviolet cutoff than the Compton wavelength cutoff used to get eq.7. Thus the prefactor <hh> should decrease as one considers larger values of 'r', and the increase in observable effect should not be as apparent when increasing the size of the BEC examples at the end of the article.

I'll appreciate any clarification here.

Torquil
 
Also there was a thesis by somebody in Ketterle's group http://cua.mit.edu/ketterle_group/Theses/Streed%20thesis.pdf
about BEC and quantum Zeno experiments - the "quantum zeno effect" is the suppression of transitions between quantum states by frequent measurements. He says measurements of this effect can limit string theories or quantum gravity.
I can't answer your questions, I'm a total novice on this subject. I just saw a video by Ketterle on BEC's and I wondered about testing quantum gravity with them. I really wished I could have been there to ask, especially since nobody had a question after the talk!
Laura
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top