Can Cauchy Sequences be Bounded? Theorem 1.4 in Introduction to Analysis

Click For Summary
Every Cauchy sequence is bounded, as established by Theorem 1.4, which follows from Theorem 1.3 that states a Cauchy sequence is convergent. Theorem 1.2 further supports this by indicating that convergent sequences are bounded. While the solution appears straightforward using these theorems, the exercise may require a proof without them for deeper understanding. If completeness of the space cannot be assumed, an alternative approach is needed to demonstrate the boundedness of Cauchy sequences. Overall, proving that all Cauchy sequences are convergent is a recommended method to establish their boundedness.
BrianMath
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Theorem 1.4: Show that every Cauchy sequence is bounded.


Homework Equations


Theorem 1.2: If a_n is a convergent sequence, then a_n is bounded.
Theorem 1.3: a_n is a Cauchy sequence \iff a_n is a convergent sequence.


The Attempt at a Solution


By Theorem 1.3, a Cauchy sequence, a_n, is a convergent sequence. By Theorem 1.2, a converging sequence must be bounded. Therefore, every Cauchy sequence is bounded.


I was just flipping through the textbook that my Analysis class will be using, "Introduction to Analysis" by Edward D. Gaughan, reading through Chapter 1. I noticed this theorem was left to an exercise, but I thought it was a bit too obvious of an answer as these two theorems in the Relevant equations were proven just before it. Is this really as simple as that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are allowed to use the theorems, then what you have suffices. However, textbooks are usually looking for you to prove without the given theorem, or prove the theorem itself. I would recommend trying to prove that all Cauchy sequences are convergent. Then you can say since all Cauchy sequences are convergent, all Cauchy sequences are bounded. That sounds like more fun, now doesn't it?
 
The problem does let you assume you are working in the reals (a complete metric space), right? If so, then yes, by all means use those theorems.

If you can't assume completeness, then you can't assume Cauchy sequences converge.
 
If you're not allowed to use completeness of the underlying space, then I would suggest you read the proof of "convergent sequences are bounded" and try to adjust that.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K