Can centripetal/centrifugal force raise itself

AI Thread Summary
A Laithwaite engine, despite its spinning motion, cannot generate sufficient aerodynamic lift to raise itself off the ground. The discussion highlights that internal forces within the engine do not contribute to lifting the entire system; an external aerodynamic effect is necessary. The engine's design lacks the capability to create a pressure differential required for lift. Historical context is provided, noting that Prof. Laithwaite's claims about gyroscopes and their weight when spinning were ultimately rejected by the scientific community. Therefore, the conclusion is that the Laithwaite engine cannot achieve lift through centripetal or centrifugal forces alone.
Spock
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So my question is, if a laithwaite engine (my attached photo) spins fast enough, will it be able to lift off the ground?

And if yes, what's the maths to calculate the speed needed to make it lift?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 727
Physics news on Phys.org
In order to be able to lift off, the engine must be capable of producing an aerodynamic effect such that the air pressure is higher under the engine and lower above the engine so we have a net upwards force. This engine by the looks of it isn't capable of producing much of an aerodynamic effect, no matter how fast is spinning.

To make it more clear, the two "wings" of this engine are raised due to internal forces. Internal forces can't make the engine raise as a whole, you need an external force (such as that from the air due to an aerodynamic effect) to raise the center of mass of the whole engine.
 
Last edited:
Spock said:
So my question is, if a laithwaite engine (my attached photo) spins fast enough, will it be able to lift off the ground? And if yes, what's the maths to calculate the speed needed to make it lift?

No. Sadly Prof. Laithwaite was mistaken.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Laithwaite

In his lecture before the Royal Institution he claimed that gyroscopes weigh less when spinning and, to demonstrate this, he showed that he could lift a spinning gyroscope mounted on the end of a rod easily with one hand but could not do so when the gyroscope was not spinning. At this time, Laithwaite suggested that Newton's laws of motion could not account for the behaviour of gyroscopes and that they could be used as a means of reactionless propulsion. The members of the Royal Institution rejected his ideas and his lecture was not published.
 
  • Like
Likes Vatsal Sanjay
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top