Can complex numbers be used in Fortran array constructors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses the use of complex numbers in Fortran array constructors, specifically when defining 2x2 matrices. The user encountered a type mismatch error due to mixing real and complex types within the same array constructor. The solution is to declare the entire array as COMPLEX, ensuring all elements are of the same type. Additionally, the Fortran EXP function can handle complex numbers directly, eliminating the need for separate calculations of real and imaginary parts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fortran programming language
  • Familiarity with complex number representation in Fortran
  • Knowledge of array constructors in Fortran
  • Basic understanding of Euler's formula and its application
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to declare and manipulate complex arrays in Fortran
  • Explore the Fortran EXP function and its capabilities with complex numbers
  • Research best practices for type consistency in Fortran array constructors
  • Investigate advanced matrix operations using complex numbers in Fortran
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for Fortran developers, particularly those working with scientific computing or simulations involving complex numbers and matrix operations.

Lukejambo
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, so I need to write a fortran code with 2, 2x2 matrices.

These matrices are in the form of B=(1 exp(i)(theta) 0 0) and D=(0 0 exp(i)(theta) 1) where i is sqrt of -1 and theta is an angle between 0 and 2pi.

I've expanded the exponential so it reads cos(theta)+isin(theta) and let theta=pi/2

I've delcared i as complex in the form of i=(0.0,1.0) however as the matrices are declared as real with real components in them (ie: 0.0, 1.0) an error appears stating that "You cannot mix types in an array constructor (Complex(Kind=1)) in a real(Kind=1) constructor."

Is it possible to mix types in an array constructor or can I have the whole array as complex?

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Lukejambo said:
Hi, so I need to write a fortran code with 2, 2x2 matrices.

These matrices are in the form of B=(1 exp(i)(theta) 0 0) and D=(0 0 exp(i)(theta) 1) where i is sqrt of -1 and theta is an angle between 0 and 2pi.

I've expanded the exponential so it reads cos(theta)+isin(theta) and let theta=pi/2

I've delcared i as complex in the form of i=(0.0,1.0) however as the matrices are declared as real with real components in them (ie: 0.0, 1.0) an error appears stating that "You cannot mix types in an array constructor (Complex(Kind=1)) in a real(Kind=1) constructor."

Is it possible to mix types in an array constructor or can I have the whole array as complex?
No, you can't mix types in an array. Make the base type of the array COMPLEX.
Lukejambo said:
Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Also, Fortran's generic EXP function accommodates the COMPLEX data type, so you can do stuff like this:

Code:
      complex i, z
      real theta
      i = (0.0, 1.0)
      theta = 0.5
      z = exp (i*theta)
      print *, z
      end

No need to use Euler's identity to calculate the real and imaginary parts separately.
 
Thanks for your help, I've declared each matrix as complex and used exp(i)(theta) instead of cos and sine however the problem still remains, here is my programme below:

program
implicit none
REAL, PARAMETER :: pi=3.14159
real :: ph
complex, dimension(2,2) :: B, D
complex :: z, ic
ph= 1.0
ic = ( 0.0, 1.0 )

z = exp(ic*ph)

B = RESHAPE( (/ 1.0, z ,0.0,0.0 /), (/2.0,2.0/) )

D = RESHAPE( (/ 0.0,0.0,z,1.0 /), (/2.0,2.0/) )

write(6,'(2f4.1)') B, D

end program

Is it because I'm using 1.0 and 0.0 as real values inside a complex array?

If so, can I convert them so they're complex numbers?
 
Lukejambo said:
If so, can I convert them so they're complex numbers?

Have you tried using (0.0, 0.0) and (1.0, 0.0) instead of 0.0 and 1.0?
 
Thank you, that works!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K