Can complex numbers, chaos theory, fractals, and power laws exist independently?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Justice Hunter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the interconnections between complex numbers, chaos theory, fractals, and power laws, questioning whether one concept is necessary for the existence of the others. It examines theoretical implications and relationships among these mathematical and physical constructs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that complex numbers are foundational to chaos theory and fractals, citing that complex numbers led to the creation of the Mandelbrot set.
  • Another participant argues that chaotic systems and the Mandelbrot set can exist independently of complex numbers, providing an example involving real numbers and periodic sequences.
  • A third participant claims that power laws do not inherently involve chaos or complexity, implying that their application can be misinterpreted.
  • Another participant mentions the Logistic equation as a source of chaos that does not require complex numbers, and discusses the concept of fractals, specifically the Cantor set, as existing without complex numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of complex numbers for chaos theory and fractals, with no consensus reached on the interdependencies among these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical constructs and definitions, such as the Hausdorff dimension, without resolving potential ambiguities or assumptions related to these terms.

Justice Hunter
Messages
98
Reaction score
7
What is the connection between complex numbers, chaos theory, fractals, and power laws?

By connection i mean, does one require the other in order to exist?

For example, from my readings, complex numbers gave rise to the chaotic system, that proceeded to create the Mandelbrot set.

So the question is are each a requisite to the next? Or can any of these develop without the prior? Do these arise in our current understanding of modern physics?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, we can have chaotic systems and the Mandelbrot set without complex numbers. For example, "start with a number, x, between 0 and 1. At each step double x then drop the integer part and keep only the fraction part". For example, if we start with, say, x= 2/3, then 2x= 4/3 so, dropping the integer part, we have 1/3. Doubling again, 2/3 again and then it repeats. That gives sequence, 1/3, 2/3, 1/3, 2/3, ... with "period 2". And, in fact, we can get sequences of any period that way so this is a chaotic system in the real numbers..

The only reason complex numbers come into it is that we get "nicer" pictures if we work in two dimensions and the complex numbers are a two dimensional set.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: just dani ok and Justice Hunter
There's nothing chaotic or complex about the power laws, except how some people apply them occasionally. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Justice Hunter
The iteration of the Logistic equation gives rise to Chaos , without need of Complex Numbers. A fractal, meaning a space with non-integer Hausdorff dimension (Edit: seems some describe it as a space whose Hausdorff dimension is larger than the topological dimension) can happen without use of Complexes too: the Cantor set has non-integer Hausdorff dimension log2/log3. I understand a chaotic system to be a Dynamical system whose attractor set (a version of a limiting space/set) is a fractal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Justice Hunter

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K