Can Conservation Laws Truly Apply in Closed Systems?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of conservation laws, specifically in the context of closed systems in classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. Participants explore the conditions under which conservation laws for energy, momentum, and angular momentum hold true, particularly focusing on the implications of external forces and the definition of closed systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that conservation laws are valid only in closed systems with zero net external force, questioning how to define the system and the significance of external forces.
  • Another participant notes that in collisions, the short impact time makes the impulse of non-impact forces negligible, allowing momentum to be conserved while energy may not be.
  • A follow-up question arises about the nature of internal and external forces, particularly regarding their impulses and the criteria for classification.
  • Participants discuss the role of free body diagrams, emphasizing that internal forces do not affect the motion of an object, while external forces can be significant during collisions.
  • There is a clarification that the force exerted by one object on another during a collision changes momentum, but additional information is needed to determine energy changes.
  • One participant speculates on the relationship between distance and momentum in collisions, suggesting that proximity may influence the momentum transfer in interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of external and internal forces, as well as the conditions under which conservation laws apply. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining the system and the conditions under which forces are considered negligible, but do not reach a consensus on these definitions or their implications.

fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
In classical mechanics (also in QM I guess), the fundamental laws of conservation (energy, momentum and angular momentum. tell me if I forget something) are valid only if the system is closed and the net external force is zero.
WE define what the system is. We can include or exclude things. These things could exert (or not) forces of different nature (gravitational, electric,magnetic, etc...) on the objects that are part of the system.
We call the system closed if no energy is coming in or out. The net external force being zero is the necessary condition for the conservation laws.

My dilemma: Can we really decide, arbitrarily, that all those external forces sum up to zero when they are much smaller (how much smaller?) than all the forces exerted by the internal objects of the system? Do we include to be part of the system ONLY those objects that we think could have a role in the situation under study? Any example?

My example is this: a collision between two cars. Total Momentum is conserved. This implies and assumes that the "net external force is zero (however there must be some other things in the world beside those 2 cars, that exert forces on those two cars too. I guess those forces are negligible and taken to be zero when compared to the mutual, action reaction forces between the two cars).

Can anyone validate?fix my thinking?
thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a collision, the impact time is very short.
This means that the impulse (F*t) of the non-impact forces is usually negligible.
That is why momentum is conserved, but energy may not be.
 
Thank you clem. That is clear. the impulse is defined as the change in momentum. The external forces could actually be large but they act over a short time so their net impulse is zero. that is your point, right?
But wouldn't this be the same for the internal forces (i.e. short time of action and small impulse)? what makes us choose certain forces to be internal and others to be external then? do the the forces that we take as external an impulse much much smaller than the impulse due to the external ones?
thanks again.
 
Sorry for the typos. I meant" do the the forces that we take as external have an impulse much much smaller than the impulse due to the internal ones?"
thanks
 
Free body diagrams still apply. Internal forces do not affect the motion of an object.
When two balls collide, the force of ball A on ball B is external to B, and is very large for a short time.
 
clem said:
Free body diagrams still apply. Internal forces do not affect the motion of an object.
When two balls collide, the force of ball A on ball B is external to B, and is very large for a short time.

Hi

Does this mean that all of the force of ball A is absorded by ball B. However this I suspect is not the same as all of the Energy (E), right?

Thanks
(Good Forum)
 
absorbed is not what happens. The force F of A on B for a time t changes the momentum of B by Ft. More has to be known to determine what happens to the energy.
 
So, If there wasn't much distance between A & B, then the momentum as a function of Ft would get smaller and smaller with increasing closeness (until it would disappear, in the classical sense when the balls come to rest) or with the number of balls or objects that interact with A within a defined space
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K