Can Early Dark Energy Affect Standard Rulers in Cosmology?

AI Thread Summary
The paper "Shifting the Universe: Early Dark Energy and Standard Rulers" discusses how early dark energy at high redshift affects the cosmic sound horizon and the distance to the last scattering of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). It highlights that this influence can lead to biases in cosmological parameters when the sound horizon is used as a standard ruler in baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). The authors suggest that fitting for the absolute ruler scale can mitigate this bias but at the cost of reducing the effectiveness of the BAO technique by half. The discussion reflects a limited interest in cosmology, focusing more on the implications for physics testing rather than surprising findings. Overall, the paper emphasizes the need to consider early dark energy's effects in cosmological measurements.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Has anyone read this paper?

Shifting the Universe: Early Dark Energy and Standard Rulers
Authors: Eric V. Linder, Georg Robbers
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)

The presence of dark energy at high redshift influences both the cosmic sound horizon and the distance to last scattering of the cosmic microwave background. We demonstrate that through the degeneracy in their ratio, early dark energy can lie hidden in the CMB temperature and polarization spectra, leading to an unrecognized shift in the sound horizon. If the sound horizon is then used as a standard ruler, as in baryon acoustic oscillations, then the derived cosmological parameters can be nontrivially biased. Fitting for the absolute ruler scale (just as supernovae must be fit for the absolute candle magnitude) removes the bias but decreases the leverage of the BAO technique by a factor 2.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2877

Submitted two days ago. I did a quick read. My interest in cosmology is fairly limited. What I have learned is geared more as a testing ground for physics. One of the reasons I insist on separating the model from the empirical content. I see nothing really surprising in that paper though.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top