Can electrons absorb a photon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IAmAnthony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Photon
Click For Summary
Electrons do not reflect photons; instead, they absorb them, which raises their energy state before re-emitting a photon when returning to a lower state. The discussion highlights a common misconception that individual electrons can reflect light, while in reality, it is the collective behavior of many atoms that results in light reflection. The size of a photon is not relevant to its interaction with electrons, as photons do not have a defined size and their interaction depends on energy rather than physical dimensions. The thread also clarifies that a free electron cannot absorb a photon; this process occurs within the context of an atom. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the principles of quantum mechanics when discussing light and particle interactions.
  • #61
Mister T said:
The potential energy is a property of the atom, not a property of anyone single component of the atom.
This is an important point that applies for potential energy in general. We sometimes speak as though it is localized to one part of a system, but generally such comments are misleading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Dale said:
... Did you ever sit down and work out the conservation of momentum and energy as I recommended?

If so, then you should have seen that scattering can conserve both energy and momentum with just the electron, but absorption cannot. That is why a single electron can scatter a photon but cannot absorb it. It is all about conservation principles. The same conservation principles lead to both behaviors.
Yes, I sat down and did what you recommended so many times. I even explained (cited from Wikipedia) how the momentum is transferred to the rest of the atom ...

Yes, I understand that (and why) a single electron can scatter a photon, but tell me: the whole atom can? If not, why not? If yes, what decides if the atom as a whole or one of its electrons would scatter an incident photon?
 
  • #63
DanMP said:
the whole atom can?
Any charged particle can participate in elastic scattering. So as long as the atom is ionized it can participate. Inelastic scattering can involve even an unionized atom.

DanMP said:
If yes, what decides if the atom as a whole or one of its electrons would scatter an incident photon?
Whether or not the electron is bound or free. If the electron is free then the electron scatters, if the electron is bound then the atom scatters. A bound electron cannot be treated independently of the rest of the atom.

For loosely bound electrons and high energy photons the difference between the two is small. I.e. the scattering is elastic for free electrons and inelastic for bound photons, but the degree of inelasticity may be small. In such cases you may see some references blur the line.
 
Last edited:
  • #64
Dale said:
... Whether or not the electron is bound or free. If the electron is free then the electron scatters, if the electron is bound then the atom scatters. A bound electron cannot be treated independently of the rest of the atom. ...
So, in scattering it is always about the electron ... We say that the atom scatters, just because the electron is part of an atom. This is very close to how I interpreted the absorption: the electron "receives" the photon but, because it is a part of an atom and momentum & energy are transferred to the rest of the atom, we say that the atom scatters/absorbs ...
 
  • #65
DanMP said:
So, in scattering it is always about the electron .
No, it is not always about the electron. It is only about the electron if the electron is unbound. I was pretty clear about that.

DanMP said:
the electron "receives" the photon
As far as I can tell the word “receives” has no meaning in this context.

At energies below pair production there are three basic interactions: a photon does not enter but does leave (emission), a photon enters but does not leave (absorbed), a photon enters and a photon leaves (scattering). “Receive” is not one of them.
 
Last edited:
  • #66
Dale said:
No, it is not always about the electron ...
Ok, thanks for your replies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K