Can Entropy and Time Reversal Coexist with Irreversible Wavefunction Collapse?

leonchik1976
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How time reversal of wave function and 2nd law of thermodynamics of entropy are settle together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leonchik1976 said:
How time reversal of wave function and 2nd law of thermodynamics of entropy are settle together?

Several answers are possible. One possible answer is that some people will say that projection is not time-reversible, so if projection is taken seriously, this kills time-symmetry in physics.

But even if you do not consider this possibility, I'd say that the answer is the same as in classical physics, where time-reversible LAWS can give rise to non-time-reversible *coarse-grained* dynamics: namely by special initial conditions.
If you start out (in a classical, time-reversible dynamics) with a highly peculiar initial state, and you only look at low-order correlation functions (coarse-graining), then you obtain a time-irreversible dynamics of these correlation functions until they reach their equilibrium values.

Mind you, I'm not saying that this is what explains finally the entropy increase in our universe. I'm only giving the example that there is no contradiction between time-reversible dynamics, and a second law of thermodynamics which prescribes the irreversibility of low-order correlation functions: it is sufficient to take a peculiar initial state.
It might of course be that there are genuinly irreversible laws too.
But there is no *contradiction* between the second law of thermodynamics, and time-symmetrical microdynamics.
 
It is just a question of time !
 
From what i know of, irreversible wave function collapses are supposedly the reason for the second law of thermodynamics.

Am I right here?
----------------------------------
Daring to Fly
http://icarus3k.blogspot.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess you can live without believing irreversible wavefunction collapse.
Following Feynman's example, increasing entropy is a consequence of statistical behavior.
 
Last edited:
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top