Can FDM be Used to Multiplex OFDM Signals at Different Frequencies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thavamaran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fdm Modulation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) to combine Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) signals that have been upconverted to different carrier frequencies, specifically in the context of optical transmission. Participants explore technical considerations and alternatives for combining these signals effectively.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is generating OFDM signals and wishes to multiplex them after upconverting to various carrier frequencies (1 GHz, 800 MHz, 1.2 GHz) using FDM.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of FDM, suggesting that simply combining the signals with a power combiner might suffice, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the original intent.
  • The original poster clarifies that the goal is to enhance bit rate and spectral efficiency for optical transmission.
  • A power combiner is described as a device that adds signals together while maintaining impedance, which is crucial at higher frequencies to avoid mismatches.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of combining signals at 2.7 GHz, with one participant asserting that this frequency is manageable with proper microwave engineering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and method of multiplexing the signals. While some suggest using a power combiner instead of FDM, others maintain the original approach of multiplexing for efficiency. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to achieve the desired outcome.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved technical considerations regarding impedance matching and the specific requirements for combining signals at higher frequencies. The discussion does not clarify the implications of these factors on the proposed methods.

thavamaran
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm currently generating OFDM signal and send it to DAC and then upconvert them to 1 GHz carrier signal.

I want to multiplex several of them, like say I upconvert them to 1 GHz, 800 MHz, 1.2 GHz, which represents 3 different signals, then multiplex them together using FDM, is it possible or is there any other better way to do this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't understand the question. If you have three signals that already have different and well separated carrier frequencies, why do you need to FDM them? As opposed to just combining them into one signal (using a power combiner)?

I suspect I've misunderstood what you are trying to do...
 
well, I want to combine them as in multiplexing them to combine bit rate and enhance my spectral efficiency and transmit them in optical. What do you meant by power combiner? Thanks for the reply.
 
A power combiner is simply a device that just adds signals together; in the same way as a mixing board adds audio signal together.
The reason why you need a combiner (or maybe a coupler of some sort) is that it keeps the impedance constant, if you simply connect wires togther you'll an impedance mismatch which is bad if you are working at a few hundred MHz.
Note that a combiner can also work as a splitter.

As long as your signals are well separated in frequency there is no reason why you can't add and them an later split the result into components.
 
But mine works in 2.7 GHz. Is that still possible?
 
2.7 GHz is not a very high frequency, as a rule of thumb you can assume that working up to 18 GHz is "easy" and reasonably cheap (although the price of the components go up with frequency).

That said, at 2.7 GHz you still need "proper" microwave engineering; but there is no need for any "exotic" solutions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K