Can Fire Exist Without Being Hot?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Enjamiering
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Heat
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of having a flame that is not hot to the touch. Participants explore the nature of flames, combustion processes, and specific examples of flames in various contexts, including underwater scenarios and special effects in performances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that flames are typically associated with heat due to the combustion process, which involves rapid oxidation and energy release.
  • One participant suggests that slow oxidation, like rusting, does not produce heat to the touch, raising the question of whether a similar phenomenon could occur with flames.
  • Another participant notes that while underwater welding can occur, it does not imply that the flames are cool, as they can still reach high temperatures capable of melting metal.
  • Some participants mention that special effects in movies use substances that combust with cooler flames, allowing performers to appear to handle flames without burns.
  • There is a discussion about the unique flame temperatures associated with different fuel-oxidizer combinations, with one participant stating that no known combination has a flame temperature low enough to avoid burning skin.
  • One participant speculates about the possibility of a chemical reaction that emits light without high temperatures, though they express uncertainty about the feasibility of achieving visible chemiluminescence with cold gases.
  • A participant shares an observation of a "marsh flame," describing it as a flickering blue flame attributed to catalytic combustion or bio-luminescence, noting its low heat output.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a flame can exist without being hot to the touch. Multiple competing views and hypotheses are presented, with ongoing uncertainty regarding the nature of flames and combustion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of flames and combustion processes, and there are unresolved questions about the conditions under which certain reactions occur.

Enjamiering
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to have a flame that's not hot to the touch?

I'm not sure how fire/flames work but if they can burn underwater I don't see how they can't somehow be safe to the touch
 
Science news on Phys.org
A flame is light emitted when something is burning.
Generally that mean a substance is combining with atmospheric Oxygen and releasing energy as both heat and visible light.
There is a lot of free oxygen in the atmosphere but very little in water (None in pure water), so burning cannot take place.
 
One idea: if you consider that a flame is the rapid oxidation of the fuel, a slow oxidation process is rust forming on an iron bar. This is not too hot to touch.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
rootone said:
There is a lot of free oxygen in the atmosphere but very little in water (None in pure water), so burning cannot take place.
High temperature torches (e.g. oxy-acetylene for welding) use their own supply of oxygen and are capable of operating both in the air and underwater. The fact that they are burning underwater does not magically make them cool to the touch -- they still melt metal.

Edit: A trip to Google suggests that wet underwater welding is normally arc welding rather than gas flame welding.
 
Generally, by definition a flame is a flame because it gives of light, which it does because it is hot.
 
Enjamiering said:
Is it possible to have a flame that's not hot to the touch?
Substances which combust with cooler flames are used in special effects in movies, where a person's clothing catches alight, etc. That's not gasoline burning on their coat as they run towards the lake, you know!

I think I've seen shows where the performer has a flame burning in his cupped hand, but extra special effects may be used here, to achieve this feat with impunity.

Nothing like this should be attempted by our readers. It is way too dangerous. (There was a news item last week about a copycat would-be firebreather rushed to A & E suffering burnt lungs when he mistakenly inhaled just before torching the airborne spray.)
 
A flame is the thin reaction zone we see when the combustion of fuel with an oxidizer occurs . Each fuel and oxidizer combination has a unique flame temperature associated with its combustion, which is the temperature associated with the net release of bond energy. I don't know of any combustible fuel-oxidizer combination that has a flame temperature low enough to not burn your skin. The lowest flame temperatures I know of are in the 200° C range. Still hot enough to hurt!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Enjamiering
The usual trick in shows is to not have the flame touch the person, or limit exposure time. Reactions between gases can happen at safe temperature but then you don't get visible flames.

I could imagine a chemical reaction that happens at low temperatures, but emits light directly from the reaction (instead of thermally induced emission in normal flames). No idea if you can get enough Chemiluminescence in a reaction of cold gases to make it visible. The two examples given there involve toxic substances.
 
I have just once seen marsh flame .

Very elusive and unstable areas of flickering blue flame very low to the ground .

Many explanations but commonly attributed to catalytic combustion of natural methane or bio-luminescence .

No explanation that I have seen has been entirely convincing .

Doesn't seem to have much heat output since flies and moths are untroubled by it when they fly over or through it .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K