Can Games Be Fair AND Not Futile?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Treadstone 71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Games
Treadstone 71
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Is is possible for a game to be fair but not futile?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Of course. Scissor paper stone is one that is fair but not futile (there is no strategy that forces a draw).
 
Thanks. Here's a follow up: If a game allows the first player to forfeit his first move, then there cannot be a winning strategy for the second player, right? Since if there is such a strategy for player 2, then player 1 could simply forfeit the frist move and adopt the strategy of player 2.
 
That assumes that the same options are open to all players at all times (apart from the first move). It is trivial to give a (trivial) game where 'player 2' has a winning strategy; forfeiting your first move *is still a move*.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top