Can Gauss' Law Be Applied to a Non-Uniformly Charged Solid Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss' Law is not applicable for calculating the total charge of a non-uniformly charged solid sphere, as it primarily applies to symmetric charge distributions. To find the total charge Q within the sphere, one must integrate the charge density, which is given as p = Ar^2. The differential charge dQ can be expressed as dQ = 4Aπr^4dr, and integrating this from 0 to R yields the total charge. If the sphere had a uniform charge distribution, Gauss' Law could be rearranged to find the enclosed charge. The focus of the discussion is on the integration method for non-uniform charge distributions.
lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2
Question:

A solid sphere of radius R has a non-uniform charge distribution of p=Ar^2, where A is constant. Find total charge Q within the volume of the sphere.


p=roe
p=Q/dV

EdA=qenclosed/Enaught

Can you use Gauss' Law for this problem when sphere is solid? If so, how?
Since p is non-uniform, we must integrate dq, correct? The answer to this question in the book is 4/5pieAr^5.

But how to get the answer? I think dq=Ar^2dV. But to have dV=4pier^2 is incorrect since the charge is not on the surface of the sphere (it is not a conductor), am I wrong?

Some help would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lonewolf219 said:
Question:

A solid sphere of radius R has a non-uniform charge distribution of p=Ar^2, where A is constant. Find total charge Q within the volume of the sphere.

p=roe
p=Q/dV

EdA=qenclosed/Enaught

Can you use Gauss' Law for this problem when sphere is solid? If so, how?
Since p is non-uniform, we must integrate dq, correct? The answer to this question in the book is 4/5pieAr^5.

But how to get the answer? I think dq=Ar^2dV. But to have dV=4pier^2 is incorrect since the charge is not on the surface of the sphere (it is not a conductor), am I wrong?

Some help would be appreciated! Thanks!
Gauss's Law gives the Electric field flux through a surface, which in very symmetric cases can give the Electric field itself. It won't help with this problem.

As you state, the volume element (differential), dV, is given by dV = (4πr2)dr.

The amount of charge, dQ, in the volume element, dV, is dQ = ρ(r)∙dV = ρ(r)∙4πr2∙dr , where ρ(r) is the volume charge density as a function of r and is given by ρ(r) = A∙r2 for some constant A. Thus dQ is given by:
dQ = 4∙A∙π∙r4∙dr

Integrate that over the sphere to find the total charge.
 
Thanks Sammy. So Guauss' Law is not used to find a non-uniform charge? If the sphere was a uniform charge, could we rearrange the variables of Gauss' Law to solve for q enclosed?
 
lonewolf219 said:
Thanks Sammy. So Guauss' Law is not used to find a non-uniform charge? If the sphere was a uniform charge, could we rearrange the variables of Gauss' Law to solve for q enclosed?
Indeed, for this case, Gauss;s Law Could be used to find the magnitude of the electric field if that's what was asked for.

All they're asking you to do is find the total charge of the sphere.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top