Can Graphing Reveal All Solutions to Complex Polynomial Systems?

lape99
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't know if I'm posting in the wright section, but i need to solve this system of equations:

{5x^4 - 4x + 5y = 0
5y^4 + 5x - 4y = 0}

I know one answer is (0;0), but i don't know how to show it, also there is another point.
Maybe someone can help me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you subtract the equations from each other, you get the following:

5x^4-5y^4-9(x-y)=0

Now, you have:
x^4-y^4=(x-y)(x^3+x^2y+xy^2+y^3), and thus, you may factorize the above equation as:
(x-y)*(5(x^3+x^2y+xy^2+y^3)-9)=0
 
Thank you very much :)
 
lape99 said:
I don't know if I'm posting in the wright section, but i need to solve this system of equations:

{5x^4 - 4x + 5y = 0
5y^4 + 5x - 4y = 0}

I know one answer is (0;0), but i don't know how to show it, also there is another point.
Maybe someone can help me?

One can use Groebner basis methods to get at all the solutions. Using the Groebner package in Maple 11, I get:
sys:=[5*x^4-4*x+5*y,5*y^4+5*x-4*y]:lprint(sys); <== input
[5*x^4-4*x+5*y, 5*y^4+5*x-4*y]
with(Groebner): <=== load the Groebner package
B:=Basis(sys,plex(x,y)):lprint(B);
[225*y+756*y^4-1280*y^7+2400*y^10-2000*y^13+625*y^16, 5*y^4+5*x-4*y]

This B is the output. The two original equations are equivalent to setting the two components of B to zero (although, of course, there may be some extraneous roots, so those must be checked in the original system). Note that the first component of B is a polynomial in y alone, so we can find roots of the two-equation system by first solving the polynomial in y, then solving for x by setting the second expression in B to zero.

f1y:=B[1]:lprint(f1y);
225*y+756*y^4-1280*y^7+2400*y^10-2000*y^13+625*y^16 <--- set to zero

Let's try to factor the polynomial.

F:=factor(f1y):lprint(F);
y*(5*y^3+1)*(125*y^12-425*y^9+565*y^6-369*y^3+225) <=== the factors

So, y = 0 or 5*y^3 + 1 = 0, or
125*y^12 -425*y^9 + 565*y^6 -360*y^3 + 225 = 0, which is a 4th degree polynomial in z = y^3.

After solving for y, we get x from 5*x = 4*y - 5*y^4.

Note: doing anything like this by hand would take months or years of work and require hundreds of pages of algebraic work. Use of a computer algebra system is essential.

RGV
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top