Can green plants reverse entropy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of entropy in relation to green plants and living organisms, exploring whether they can be seen as reversing entropy. Participants examine the implications of the second law of thermodynamics, the role of energy inputs, and the nature of living systems in the context of entropy.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that green plants and living organisms appear to increase order at a molecular level, suggesting a reversal of entropy.
  • Others contend that while living organisms may decrease their own entropy, they increase the entropy of their environment, thus adhering to the second law of thermodynamics.
  • A participant notes that the entropy of the Sun increases as hydrogen is converted into helium, which is presented as a counterpoint to the idea of entropy reversal by living systems.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that the second law applies only to isolated systems, and that living organisms, as dissipative structures, can maintain a constant entropy through energy exchange with their surroundings.
  • One participant highlights the necessity of energy input for life to maintain order, suggesting that this energy expenditure is what allows for the temporary decrease in entropy within living systems.
  • There is mention of confusion surrounding the concepts of 'order' and thermodynamic entropy, indicating that misunderstandings may contribute to misconceptions about entropy in living organisms.
  • A later reply proposes that all forms of life can be seen as examples of reverse entropy, but emphasizes that they are not closed systems and rely on external energy sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between living organisms and entropy. There is no consensus on whether green plants or life in general can be said to reverse entropy, as differing interpretations of the second law and the nature of energy inputs are presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of entropy and order, as well as the unresolved nature of how energy inputs affect the overall entropy of the universe.

Eric Flesch
Entropy is said to always increase. But do not green plants reverse
entropy? Seems to me that everything they do increases order, down to
the molecular level.
 
Science news on Phys.org
On 12 Oct, 20:12, e...@flesch.org (Eric Flesch) wrote:
> Entropy is said to always increase.  But do not green plants reverse
> entropy?  Seems to me that everything they do increases order, down to
> the molecular level.[/color]

No, the entropy of the Sun increases. Hydrogen is converted into
helium. Everyone should read mark and inwardly digest. This is one of
the arguments put forward against Evolution, that entropy decreases.- Ian Parker
 
On Oct 12, 3:12 pm, e...@flesch.org (Eric Flesch) wrote:
> Entropy is said to always increase.  But do not green plants reverse
> entropy?  Seems to me that everything they do increases order, down to
> the molecular level.[/color]

All living things tend to decrease their own entropy. But the second
law of thermodynamics suggests that, since entropy of the entire
closed system must increase, they are increasing the entropy of their
environment even more so than they are changing their own. This makes
sense in that living things require inputs of energy from the world
around them to survive. Without those energy inputs, they would die
and end up in a state of ever increasing entropy very quickly.
 
Eric Flesch <eric@flesch.org> wrote:

> Entropy is said to always increase. But do not green plants reverse
> entropy? Seems to me that everything they do increases order, down to
> the molecular level.[/color]

No.
In the proces: Photons + molecules -> other molecules + some heat
there is a net increase of entropy,
(unless you forget about the photons)

Jan
 
Eric Flesch wrote:
> Entropy is said to always increase.[/color]

A truly terrible approximation of the 2nd Law. A few minutes on Wiki
would give you the proper definition and perhaps an understanding of why
your example presents no difficulties.

> But do not green plants reverse
> entropy? Seems to me that everything they do increases order, down to
> the molecular level.[/color]

Yes, but with considerable input of energy. If you like, you could
consider the entropy loss well and truly paid for by entropy increase in
the sun.
 
Eric Flesch wrote on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:12:11 +0000:

> Entropy is said to always increase.[/color]

This is only valid if the system is isolated and not in equilibrium.

In general, the entropy of a body can increase, decrease, or remain
constant.

> But do not green plants reverse
> entropy?[/color]

Contrary to some misconceptions propagating in creationists literature,
living organism follow the second law.

A living organism is an instance of dissipative structure. Since they
are not isolated (interchange matter and energy with surroundings)
its entropy is not forced to increase. In fact, a mature organism is
one for which its entropy is almost constant.

> Seems to me that everything they do increases order, down to the
> molecular level.[/color]

Due to bad textbooks there is additional confusions regarding the
concept of 'order' described by statistical entropy

S_inf = k ln W,

the concept of spatial order, and the concept of thermodynamic entropy

S_th = (U + pV - muN) / T.

Several of those confusions are also the basis for creationists
(unfounded) attacks on science.

For a more detailed discussion of the relationship between living
organism and the second law of thermodynamics see

http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/05/second-law-of-thermodynamics-living.html

and references cited therein. If you are really interested on the
thermodynamics of living bodies I recommend you the textbook on
biological thermodynamics.

--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/miscellaneouszone/guidelines.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe that all forms of life can be considered examples of reverse entropy in and of themselves, however they are not closed systems. All forms of life rely on external sources of energy in order to maintain their complex organization. Even then they eventually die. Death might result from an overload of outside energy or it may simply be entropy catching up with a temporary exception to the rule.

The main point is that in order to reverse entropy or even create the illusion of such a reversal, energy must be expended from another system whose entropy level will be increasing to such an extent that the overall result will still be a degeneration of the complexity of the universe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K