Can h(x)=(cos x)^x be written as a composition of two functions f and

AI Thread Summary
The function h(x) = (cos x)^x cannot be expressed as a composition of two functions f and g, where f(x) = x^n and g(x) = cos x, due to the variable exponent x in h(x). The chain rule for differentiation does not apply in this case because the exponent in f(x) must be constant for the power law to hold. Attempts to redefine f(x) as a^x or f(x, n) = x^n still lead to inconsistencies with the variable exponent in h(x). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correct notation and understanding the implications of variable versus constant exponents in differentiation. Ultimately, defining f(x) to meet the requirements of h(x) proves impossible.
PeterPumpkin
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Can h(x)=(cos x)^x be written as a composition of two functions f and g where f(x)=x^n and g(x)=cosx ? where h=fog

REASON FOR ASKING: I am wondering this in connect with a differentiation I was having trouble with (but can now solve thanks to this forum). I mistakenly thought that I could apply the chain rule for composition of functions. Seems it doesn't apply. (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2796762#post2796762)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


You need to be careful with notation. In your example
h(x)=f\circ g(x)=(\cos(x))^n
where you have a different variable in the exponent. So all rules you know are valid without exception, but you have to get the notation right.

You could also try
f(x)=a^x or f(x,n)=x^n
but you'll notice that at some point the expression won't match what you have in your rules.
 


It can't, because in h(x) the exponent is x, the variable, while in f(x) the exponent is a constant. This makes an important difference when you are differentiating because the standard "power law" only applies when the exponent is constant.
 


Gib Z said:
It can't, because in h(x) the exponent is x, the variable, while in f(x) the exponent is a constant. This makes an important difference when you are differentiating because the standard "power law" only applies when the exponent is constant.
Specifically, the derivative of xa, with a constant, is axa-1 while the derivative of ax is (ln(a))ax.
 


Thanks. I can see my mistake --- there's no way to define f(x) to satisfy the requirements.
 


There is. Remember that f(x) = e^{\ln f(x)}
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top