Can Hunter Values Be Converted to Transmission Percentage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ephphatha16
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Hunter values, which include lightness and color components, are being sought for conversion into transmission percentage for a study on beetroot membrane permeability. The original inquiry highlights the need for dependent variable values in transmission percentage, but only Hunter values are available. Suggestions include conducting a Google search for relevant studies on the temperature's effect on membrane permeability. The discussion emphasizes the importance of finding secondary sources that may provide the necessary conversion or related data. Overall, the conversion of Hunter values to transmission percentage remains unresolved in the thread.
ephphatha16
Messages
14
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


[/B]
I was searching for a secondary source on investigating the effect of temperature on membrane permeability of beetroot and i need the d.v. values in transmission%.

But I am getting the dv values in Hunter (‘L’ (lightness), ‘a’ (redness and greenness) and ‘b’ (yellowness and blueness)) values.

Thanks a lot in advance!

Is there a way to convert Hunter values to transmission %?

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution


n/a
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done a google search to see what comes up?

There are several references shown when searching with " effect of temperature on membrane permeability of beetroot"
 
  • Like
Likes ephphatha16
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
11K
3
Replies
105
Views
14K
Replies
77
Views
12K
Back
Top