Can Hydroclauric Acid and Water Create a pH Greater than 7? Find Out Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter thee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid Ph
AI Thread Summary
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) typically lowers pH due to its H+ ion contribution, making it challenging for a solution of HCl and water to exceed a pH of 7. However, under specific conditions, such as using very dilute HCl in cold water, it is theoretically possible for the pH to be slightly above 7. This occurs because the self-ionization of water can lead to a higher pH at lower temperatures, where pure water's pH can exceed 7. Despite this, any addition of HCl generally results in a net decrease in pH. Therefore, while there are scenarios where the pH could be greater than 7, they are limited and require precise conditions.
thee
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I want to ask that there is any situation that the solution of Hydroclauric acid and water can make the pH of this solution gretater than 7.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, to some extent. At pH 7 there is no abundance of H+ or OH-.

However, water has the following reaction:

H2O -> H+ + OH-

So strickly theoretically speaking, if the acid is very diluted, your water isn't pure and the conditions are favourable, why not?
 
2H_2O \longrightarrow H_3O^+ + OH^-

The self-ionization of water is endothermic (see reaction above). If you low the temperature, the concentration of H_3O^+ will diminish and the pH will be greater than 7 for a pure water. If you add very dilute hydrochloric acid at this conditions it is very probable that the pH of this solution is greater than 7.
 
Not really. HCl, Hydrochloric Acid can only ADD H+ ions, and LOWER the pH.
If you really want to nit pick, however...
At temperatures below 25 degrees C, the pH of pure water is slightly higher than 7.0. At 15 C, it's about 7.16, for example. So if you take cold water, and any such a tiny amount of HCL that it won't lower the pH below 7.0, you can have an HCL solution with a pH above 7.00. (But adding the HCl still lowered the pH a bit).
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top