Can I bypass General Physics I-III for theoretical classes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges and considerations of transitioning into advanced physics courses without a strong foundational background in introductory physics. The individual is pursuing a math degree while interested in theoretical physics, particularly in areas like Electromagnetism, Analytical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, and Relativity. Concerns are raised about whether self-study in basic physics concepts would suffice to succeed in these advanced classes. Participants emphasize the importance of a solid foundation in fundamental physics principles, suggesting that while it is possible to skip introductory courses, doing so may hinder deeper understanding. They recommend self-studying basic concepts and highlight that advanced classes often build on these fundamentals. The consensus is that a strong math background can aid in grasping physics concepts, but foundational knowledge is crucial for comprehensive learning and success in higher-level courses.
coreyjwade
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Currently I am back in school taking some math courses to finish an undergraduate degree while getting credit for a master's program in math. I am fairly competent in calculus and did well in the first half of an introductory physics class that I had to withdraw from for other reasons. My long term interests are in astronomy. When it comes to math, I am more of a theoretical person. The reason that I can never fit the general physics classes into my schedule is because of the time consuming labs that I have no interest in taking (I currently work as well). I am very interested in taking the 2nd-3rd year theoretical classes like Electromagnetism, Analytical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics and Relativity. I am wondering if I would be able to handle such classes, or if they would be over my head because my physics background is not strong enough.

A parallel that I would like to make is with the math course Analysis. Calc III is a requirement to take this class. But the reality is that you learn Calculus from the beginning in Analysis in a much more theoretical way. Knowing Calculus helps, but it's not essential to succeed in such a class since you technically learn it from a proof-only mathematical perspective. Are classes like Electromagnetism similar? Is having a basis in electromagnetism with some self study enough to take such a class? Would auditing the class, but not taking the lab cut it? Any advice would be appreciated. I sent a similar but shorter message to the physics chair of the department several weeks ago and was ignored.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2nd/3rd year classes always start out with the very most basic stuff/concepts. Being a math graduate student you'll be fine.
 
You can skip into the sophomore level physics classes (modern, classical, E&M, eventually quantum) without the intro levels (as long as they don't explicitly require them) but I suggest you get an intro physics book or two and learn some of the basic concepts on your own - while the labs themselves may not be necessary, they will expect you to know and understand the definitions of things like force, torque, momentum, and basics from E&M before staring more advanced courses.
 
Thanks guys. This is very helpful.
 
You may be successful by skipping the fundamentals but I would not recommend it. If you are interested in pursuing physics you need to build a foundation. These classes are the basis for that foundation. Make an effort to schedule them.
 
Integral is right. I needed to skip general physics and I started my physics course from 2nd year. I was successful in terms of grades and knowledge however for in-depth understanding you still need basics. Don't worry - with good math foundation it's like reading picture book. Math is simple so you can focus only on physics and it's not as boring as you think. It's like reading a prologue to your favourite book (at least I found oscillators & waves and EM interesting). What's more if you don't have classes such as hydrodynamics or materials properties taking intro courses may be the only chance to learn it.
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
Back
Top